| Strong vitality has been emerging since the beginning of the transportation oflaw to country side, which is pushed forward by government. But thoseuncomfortable and embarrassing things also have rose, following the furtherinvolvement of law in local society. The contradiction between nation’s legislationand local rules may exist too. The purpose of this article is not to searchaforementioned differences or contradictions purely but to focus on investigation tothe judicatory office in town. We try to discuss the application of the law in countryside in a micro vision. In addition, the investigation of the concrete behaviors of thejudicatory office in town may cause people to attach importance to and review it.In this article, the research of judicatory office in town will focus on the patternsof settlement of disputes. Why the judicatory office in town works like this, and howto operate it more smoothly are all token into consideration. Only these theory issuesare settled finally, can the judicatory office in town satisfy native society‘s actualanticipation and resolve local conflicts efficiently.The article can be divided into five parts:The first part tries to deep reveal growth background of the judicatory office intown, and analyze its basic function, and show the penetration of state’s power. So wecan find that the judicatory office in town undertakes a heavy obligation in the processof constitutionality.The second part elaborates the historical conventions of the native society toshow what the expectance of the native society is. Comparably speaking, we can findthe actual situations in which the judicatory office in town resolves the disputes.Combining the local condition can successfully dispose of the disputes.The third part is to analyze and generalize the first and the second part,expounding the concrete dilemmas of the judicatory office in town which is inparticular condition. The dilemmas include two parts, named as adaptation of law andconstruction regularly.The fourth part primarily analyzes two formations of disputes settlement underthe dilemmas above mentioned. The one is formalizing pattern whose purpose is to put law into practice, the other is called un-formalizing pattern which is principallyattributed to the disputes settlement.The fifth part is the deeper review of patterns of disputes settlement, andregularization construction of the judicatory office in town on the basis of thetransportation of law to country side aforementioned.The conclusion which is the generalization and refining of the thinking processsays that non-formalizing pattern may more efficiently mitigate the localcontradictions and resolve the disputes of the native society. Simultaneously, we hopethat the judicatory office in town will transform favorably, following the step ofmodern transformation in the native society. The transportation of law to country sidewill change into the welcoming of law to country side. |
