Study On The Theory Of The New Institutionalism Politics

Since the reform and opening up, especially since the1990s, our society has begun to enter a criticalperiod of development and transformation, the various interests of the game and contradictions began tohighlight social fairness and justice calls for increasingly high, whether from the strategy of developmentof the national macro or micro policy arrangements have demonstrated the urgent needs of the systemdesign and conversion theory. Therefore, the system of theoretical and practical studies of political sciencescholars carry out an important task in the realization of socialist modernization and the rejuvenation of theChinese nationAppear as a separate discipline, the research and analysis of the system is the core of politicalscience, said history from the political point of view, the very ancient tradition of research in politicalscience on the system of Plato’s Utopia Aristotle research on the city-state system, open the system ofpolitical science on the first of its kind, until the19th century and the early20th century, the systemanalysis to always occupy the mainstream Western political science. However, after the emergence of thebehavioral revolution of the1950s changed the tradition of the study of political science on the system, theimportance of the study of the political system is increasingly reduced,"just a stage of political behavior.With methodology of the natural sciences and the mode, Behaviorist reshape political science,Behaviorism core idea is the observed behavior to explain political phenomena. But behaviorism politicalscience there Inadequate: positivism, overly respected experience natural science research methods andmodes of separation of fact and value, and the pursuit of political research value neutrality; emphasis onacademic and ignore the reality of social and political study of the problem, too much emphasis on the empirical theory while ignoring political philosophy. Because of these shortcomings, behaviorism iscriticized, which from all aspects of the political scientist. Behaviorism in political science, while thedecline, objectively lead to the emergence of an alternative paradigm, the emergence of a new paradigm ofpolitical science, must be able to combine the advantages of traditional political science and behaviorism inpolitical science, abandon their own shortcomings. It is in such a context, the New Institutional Politics onthe basis of the criticism of behaviorism in political science, attention to the system’s role in political life.In1984, the American scholar James March and John Olsen organizational factors in the political life ofthe new institutionalism "article published in the" American Political Science Review ", opened the NewInstitutional Politicslearn research prologue. After30years of development, the new institutionalism as apolitical thought has become more sophisticated. The main theories include the theory of rational choiceinstitutionalism, historical institutionalism and sociological institutionalism. New Institutional Politics inWestern political thought is increasingly becoming the political circles mainstream thought.China’s political circles as academic forefront of political thought, the political thought of the newinstitutionalism research began in the early1990s. This paper attempts to further study of the system in theexisting research on the basis of the political thought of the new institutionalism. This paper attempts tofurther study of the system in the existing research on the basis of the political thought The first part of thepaper introduces the status quo of the significance of the study, as well as foreign political circles this trendof thought; second part mainly on the new institutionalism political thought generation knowledgebackground, theoretical background and the establishment and the course of the study; the third part of theNew Institutional Politics Trend analysis path, and a comparative analysis of these major analysis of thepath of the core point of view, the principle, and then find a space for exchange and dialogue to come to themain analysis path; the four-part third part discusses the basis for evaluation of the new institutionalism political thought useful to explore the strengths and weaknesses of the theory of the future orientation ofthe new institutional theory; theory study abroad aimed for our own use, based on the purpose of the fifthpart of the new institutionalism and political thoughts in our generation, the development of research andto examine its use in our country.This paper uses methods: literature analysis, historical analysis, comparative analysis, descriptiveresearch method.The purpose of this study three points: First of political science methodology system content is rich,enabling readers to more comprehensive understanding of the political thought of the new institutionalismin political science. The second is to facilitate the exchange of theory and practice in Western politicaldisciplines, grasp the forefront of the political theory. Help solve practical problems in system constructionof China’s transition profound grasp of the origin of the system, the relationship between the changes andsystem design, system and behavior through the study of the political thought of the new institutionalism,can bring some useful lessons for our current system construction.