Equity Firms Vie For Influence On The Company's Strategic Opportunities

Corporate enterprises since its inception, there is the equity scramble phenomenon, caused by litigation and other legal activities. The operation of the legal existence of the corporate enterprises inextricably linked, the integrity of the legal system is the protection of the stable and healthy development of the Company, and the judicial relationship problems has always been the focus of research in the field of corporate governance, judicial intervention in corporate equity compete for the settlement of disputes, be the existence and development of enterprises and what the consequences, and to take what measures to hedge its exposure to the the judicial factors that adversely impact on corporate governance and strategic development, is one of the people trying to explore the topic. Research in this field to enhance parties’ awareness of corporate governance and proper handling judicial proceedings involving the contention of the company equity, equity contention v. to minimize the destructive impact on the company’s.This paper focuses on equity contention as well as equity scramble v. on the development of the company’s start on. The first part as the introduction, from the background of the topics and research purposes, methods and significance of two parts discusses the negative impact of the company’s equity interest in competing for shareholders insecurities and how to guard against and defuse the risk of litigation preliminary introduction and the purpose of this research, methods and significance of simple statements. The main content of the second part is to relate the ins and outs of the equity transfer disputes, the transfer process with equity from the companies involved equity transfer and disputes arising schematic diagram and equity change table two aspects statements, because this article is a case to illustrate the problem, so generally the case the introduction of the background is very necessary, is the premise and basis of the article further clarify the point. The third part is the focus of this article detailed argument Corporation and Haimeng application Chifeng Ronda Liquefied Petroleum Gas Co., Mahatma Investment Group Co.,Ltd. focuses on judicial equity contention dispute solving process, this article from the Court of First Instance hearing Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court for retrial, the appeal of the Supreme People’s Court and Comment on the controversial issues of the case, the four levels of discourse, comprehensive analysis and interpretation, especially in the case the focus of controversy, a comprehensive analysis of the ins and outs of the case, how option competition impacts the company to grasp strategy chances.The fourth part discusses the case of the development of the company, and illustrative examples that above Haimeng Shen Co., Ltd. and Inner Mongolia Branch of Sinopec strategic cooperation, for example. Part V as the conclusion of this article, the reasons for caused Mongolia application disputes the analysis, so as to make improving suggestions for how to improve the external legal environment of the internal corporate governance and corporate governance.The last part is the conclusion, summary discussion of the full text.