On Supervision System Of Network Tort In China

The widely use of internet has unprecedently changed the ways of human’s existence, life and production, expanded an vast and close space for communication among people, provided so much convenience for people’s lives. However, at the mean time, the rights and interests of civil subjects are violated by different kinds of activities in the network followed by the supplied convenience. The behaviors of network torts refer to that of intellectual property, the right of individual reputation, the right of privacy, the right reputation of enterprise and so on. They not only affect the people’s work, lives, and a great many losses of enterprises and individuals, but also disorder the normal regulations of internet and competition in order. Furthermore, they would deeply influence China’s economic development and social stability. Therefore, we must carry on the research of supervision system of network tort in China and find the proper way for the healthy development of the network in China. I analyzed the behaviors of the torts on the web, found the roots and point out the disadvantages of the supervision system of network:one、the o supervision system of network tort in China is not perfect in law and does not have detailed rules and regulations. Our law is always blank when encountered some new behaviors of the network torts. two、we do not have independent executive department. The department concerned is in low efficiency in the law operation. three、there is not a concrete regulations of internet industries. four、 there is no rigid standards for the accessibility and withdraws of the internet market. If we want to perfect the supervision system of network tort in China, we should absorb the advantages and close the gaps based on drawing lessons from advanced system of management abroad and combined with the national conditions. Firstly, the system of law and regulation should be improved; secondly, the implementation of the real name system in the network should be conducted gradually; thirdly, the rigid system of accessibility and withdraw of the internet market to limit the contents and scope of network information. Then, the industry self-discipline should be intensified. The government should set up sound industry regulations and standards to lift the sense of responsibilities of the vendor of network. Lastly, bring the power of people into play to establish the public-participated and coordinated supervision system from all walks of society.