Research On Network Public Opinion Influence For China’s Judicial Trial

The advantage of bidirectional transmission of information, network makes not onlyinformation receiving but also the information feedback available for the public at any time.Network public opinions take the general social moral value as the standard to judge between rightand wrong, while judicial adjudication depends on the justice in the strict legal sense to decide a case.In addition, since the subject of network public opinions doesn’t have high quality and is seriouslyemotional, our nation lacks effective regulation on the network public opinions and the judicialauthority is faced with crisis of confidence, Since network public opinions often go beyond thereasonable limits, they often cause tremendous with independent and impartial judicial adjudication.The numerous and complex network public opinions are mixed with a variety of voices andappeals, But it is undeniable mainstream network media is to justice for the judicial adjudication andrepresent the most authentic voice of the public. Therefore, there is an intercommunication bridgebetween the network public opinions and the judicial adjudication. How to solve the contradictionbetween the public network, the judiciary is an issue we should face.This paper demonstrates the impact of network public opinions on judicial adjudication in fiveparts:The first part Through extensive literature books to read at home and abroad. Describe thepurpose of the essay writing significance. Summary and analysis of the core.The second part summarizes the concept of public analyzes the internal relations between them.A summary view of the core and analysis, the formation of a relatively detailed overview.The third part analyzes the impact of the pros and cons of the public network, Impact both onthe specific performance is analyzed and described, but also the cause of these effects for a detailedanalysis, In the analytical tools and perspective, As a theoretical analysis, the angle of view ofmacroeconomic analysis, has been done in detail.The fourth part The"7·20Capital Airport bombings" were content analyzed, Recommendationsmade relatively, Improve network awareness, focusing on network media data collection, improvedifferent aspects of legislation gives constructive comments. By Ucinet analysis software, And theresulting data analysis and interpretation. In the case of actual data, given the appropriateinstructions revelation.The Fifth part Network of public opinion on how to deal with the judiciary, For example: toimprove network-aware, focusing on network media data collection, improve different aspects oflegislation gives constructive comments.