Contract Dispute Report Twin Cities Rural Land Contract

With the exemption of agricultural production, national support for major grainproducing areas and provide subsidies to promote agricultural development, farmerincome policy, the main parties of the contracted landenthusiasm unprecedentedupsurge, the agricultural production andfarmers income has the good situation ofhitherto unknown. However,because the land is regarded as a kind of special productiondata, in the new tax policy and regulation, input and output efficiency of land thantheincrease in farmers’ production enthusiasm, arouse, mobilize the enthusiasm offarmers contracted land, relying on the land labor richenthusiasm also caused manyproblems, caused by the land transfer landcontract disputes, brings many adverse effectsto the rural economic development and social stability. How to properly resolvethesecontradictions and disputes, the correct guidance and make good use ofouragricultural management subject in the policy stimulus for the construction of new ruralareas had burst out of the production enthusiasm is a realistic problem urgently to besolved.This paper selects Shuangcheng city of rural land contract disputes as the object foranalysis. Shuangcheng city is the capital of Heilongjiang, a satellite city of Harbin City,rich in agricultural resources, is an important national commodity grain production base.In recent years, because of the agricultural production and operation mode and thenational, provincial,municipal agricultural policy update, land contract relations appearnew change, land contract disputes continue to emerge, the court in such casesagradually increasing. This is a representative of the Heilongjiang agricultural bigprovince. Therefore, this paper will start in the currentcontract system framework has tostudy and reality, analyzes and summarizes the actual case, to analyze the content typeof the contract of rural land disputes, the causes, and puts forward the countermeasures tosolve these disputes, so as to provide positive thinking such contradictionsactively thefeasibility of the proposed solution, for the judicial practice.