The newly revised "Civil Procedure Law" to take on the legal consequences of latediversified processing mode of proof, the burden of proof for the past, no longer is theonly evidence of the consequences of loss of rights, but to consider the reasons andgrounds are overdue establishment of proof, such as a combination of factors diversifiedprocessing. Although diverse processing modes overdue proof of judicial reform topromote further toward fairness and efficiency to provide a favorable legal protection,but because of its presence at these deficiencies, causing many problems in judicialpractice. In view of this, the burden of proof in this article about the problem of overduejustice case from the start after the Civil Procedure Law changes, before and aftermodification by the comparative analysis of the case, sought evidence from many notedin our past problems in judicial practice, learn from foreign experience in overdue proofon the basis of a civil action to make some sound proof overdue initiatives to furtherimprove our overdue diversified processing mode of proof used in judicial practice. |