A Comparative Study Of 0-3 Year-old Early Childhood Curriculum

Early education curriculum is the heart， which is to evaluate the merits ofan important criterion for the quality of an institution. Because the curriculumis the carrier of educational goals， is the goal to achieve a bridge， it teachers，children， parents， linked to the composition of an educational system. However，due to the current lack of theoretical guidance curriculum early childhoodinstitutions and institutional norms， curriculum variety， quality is uneven，there may be some negative impact on the development of infants and young children0-3years old. Therefore， the early education curriculum in-depth research， thecurrent priority is to understand and regulate the early education of0-3yearsof work.The research in this area is relatively small， especially systematic researchon early education programs， but the lack of comparative studies of differentearly childhood curriculum. To this end the author of two more representative ofJinan chain early childhood institutions as an example (an international chainof early childhood institutions， a national chain of early childhood institutionsare)， through the use of literature， comparative studies， interviews and caseanalysis these two early childhood programs conducted in-depth comparative study.Trying to find ideas they courses，course objectives，course content，curriculumimplementation， curriculum evaluation and other aspects of diversity as well astheir common strengths and weaknesses. And so as the basis， in conjunction withthe earliest child psychology， pedagogy， made a number of0-3years to buildearly childhood curriculum revelation.This paper is divided into four parts. The first is the introduction. The maintopics of the reasons explained，the purpose and significance of research methods.At the same time research scholars were reviewed， summarized theachievementsandshortcomings of existing research and innovation of the proposedresearch.Chapter One: Overview and Introduction of two early childhood curriculumorganization.Overview of the status of various aspects of the two institutions， it also explains the choice of these two institutions as a reason for thecomparative study courses.Chapter2: Dimensions author separately from the curriculum philosophy，courseobjectives，course content，curriculum implementation and evaluation of programsfor early childhood programs of the two agencies conducted intensive comparisonand analysis.Chapter III: Conclusions and Implications. Through the course of Jinan City，two different aspects of early childhood institutions depth comparison， I findthe two bodies from a common curriculum strengths and weaknesses. And so as thebasis，in conjunction with the earliest child psychology，pedagogy，made a numberof0-3years to build early childhood curriculum revelation. These revelationsare:(one) ensure that the theoretical basis for curriculum design (two) adhereto the dual nature of the course features (three) children grow up happydetermining concept-based curriculum (four) both comprehensive anddifferentiated curriculum goals (five) outstanding basic curriculum and life ofthe (six) additional courses conservation parents to raise capacity to teach(seven) built into the curriculum concept creation to promote child developmentcurriculum evaluation system aimed at curriculum implementation (eight).