Font Size: a A A

The Use Of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization To Predict Response To Epirubicin Intravesical Instillation Therapy For Bladder Cancer

Posted on:2015-10-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:W C DunFull Text:PDF
GTID:2284330431477735Subject:Urology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:Use of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in patients with Epirubicin instillation therapy for bladder cancer to research the relationship between the FISH resutls with tumor recurrence and progress.Methods:Candidates for standard of epirubicin intravesical instillation therapy were offered participation in a clinical trial. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed before epirubicin, at1month and3months during epirubicin therapy with maintenance. Assess the relationship between fluorescence in situ hybridization results and tumor recurrence or progression.Results:1. A total of43patients participated in the study, male41cases (95.3%), female2cases (4.7%),with average age of63.7years. At a median followup of21.3months34.9%(15cases) of patients had recurrent tumors and14.0%(6cases) experienced disease progression.2. In the process of Epirubicin intravesical instillation therapy after TUR, each observation point of FISH results in patients with positive results has a higher rate of tumor recurrence and tumor progression than patients with negative results.For patients with positive FISH results before epirubicin and at1month, the tumor recurrent rate were48.3%VS.7.1%(P=0.021) and56.3%VS.22.2%(P=0.024) respectively,with significant statistically difference; for patients with positive FISH results at3months, the tumor recurrent rates were42.1%VS.29.2%(P=0.377),with no significant statistically difference.Patients who had positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results also more likely to have disease progression.For patients with positive FISH results at1month, the tumor progression rates were31.3%VS.3.7%(P=0.039), with significant statistically difference,for patients with positive FISH results before epiru-bicin and at3months, the tumor progression rates were20.7%VS.0%(P=0.172) and26.3%VS.4.2%(P=0.101) respectively,with no significant statistically difference. 3. According to the preset observation points, three FISH detection were completed in all patients, analysis the relationship between the number of positive FISH results of each patient with tumor recurrence and progress. For patients with1time,2times and3times of positive FISH results, the tumor recurrence rates were36.4%(4/11),46.2%(6/13) and55.6%(5/9), P>0.05, with no statistical difference; The tumor progression rates were0%(0/11),15.4%(2/13) and44.4%(4/9), P<0.05, with significant statistically difference.4. Patients who had a positive FISH result at1month and3months after the process of continuous Epirubicin Intravesical instillation were more likely to have regression tumors than those who had negative results at both times.The tumor recurrence rates were55.6%and17.6%, P=0.078, with no statistical difference; The tumor progression rate were44.4%and0%respectively, P=0.008, with significant statistically difference.Conclusion:1. In the process of continuous Epirubicin Intravesical instillation, The FISH test results at1month has a reliable value in predicting tumor recurrence and progress. Patients who had positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results is not sensitive to treatment, and face a higher risk of tumor recurrence and progression.This information may be used to counsel patients about alternative treatment strategies.2. Patients with multy times (3times or2times) positive FISH results have a larger risk of tumor progression than patients with a single posibive FISH result, but there was no significant difference in the risk of tumor recurrence.3. Patients who had a positive FISH result at1month and3months after the process of continuous Epirubicin Intravesical instillation were more likely to have regression tumors than those who had negative results at both times, but there was no significant difference in the risk of tumor recurrence.
Keywords/Search Tags:bladder carcinoma, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization, Epirubicin, recurrence, progression, intravesical instillation therapy
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
The Research About Apoptotic Mechanisms Of Mitomycin And Epirubicin Against Bladder Cancer Cells And Intravesical Them Instillation For Preventing Tumor Recurrence
The Effect Of Intravesical Therapy With Epirubicin Or Hydroxycamptoitiecin On Preventing Postopeartive Recurrence Of The Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Following TUR-BT
Instillation Of Epirubicin (EPI) For Prevention Of Postoperative Recurrence Of Superficial Bladder Cancer
The Effect Of Different Postoperative Instillation Therapy Time On The Recurrence Rate Of Bladder Tumor
Clinical Study On Intravesical Instillation Of Brucea Javanica Oil Emulsion For The Prevention Of Postoperative Recurrence Of Bladder Cancer And The Study Of The Immunology Of RBC In Patients With Bladder Cancer During Intravesical Instillation Of Br
Efficacy Analysis Of Three Bladder Instillation Drugs On Preventing Recurrence Of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Clinical Study On Intravesical Instillation Of THP In Combination With Oral Ube Against Postoperative TURBT Recurrence Of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Intravesical Instillation Of Pirarubicin Combined With BCG In The Prophylaxis Of Local Recurrence Of The Bladder Cancer And The Expression Of COX-2 In Bladder Carcinomas And It's Effects On Proliferation And Angiogenesis
Comparative Study Of The Efficacy Of Gemcitabine And Hydroxy-camptothecin Intravesical Instillation On Prevention Of Postoperative Recurrence Of Bladder Tumor
10 The Effectiveness Of Gemcitabine Versus Epirubicin For Intravesical Chemotherapy