Research On The Historical Case Of Liang Shuming&Mao Zedong In1953

There was a turning point in the history of the People’s Republic of China in1953. The national economy had generally recovered in three years, however, the identity of the backward agricultural country remained unchanged, and the contradiction between the ownership of peasants and the industrialization of the country was becoming more and more obvious. From preparing to formulating, and then to putting into practice, the general route in the transitive period made the social nature of China gradually turned from the New democratic into Socialism, which was related to the watershed about the future and destiny of China. The origin of the historical detective between Liang Shuming and Mao Zedong is just about the general route in the transitive period.As soon as the general route in the transitive period was proposed, the voice of the masses went over to the side of support. Liang Shuming was a man of advocating the spirit of doubt, if he didn’t research by himself, he will never echo other people’s views, even got into fights with Mao Zedong at any price. Mao Zedong criticized that Liang Shuming was an out-and-out hypocrite who was good at making pungent criticism, moreover, Liang Shuming accused Mao Zedong who was short of the magnanimity of self-criticism as the leader. Outwardly, the historical case is abrupt, nevertheless, if we dip into the fact we could find that on the basis of what kind of theory or belief to solve the problems of China is the pivotal reason, especially concerning how to properly deal with the relationship between industrialization and the problems facing agriculture, rural areas and farmers is the key of choosing the right path of modernization in China. When Liang Shuming reviewed the contradiction of agricultural development and industrialization, as far as he concerned, the gap between the workers and peasants’ life was just like heaven and hell, and he thought that national industrialization should be coordinated with agricultural development instead of sacrificing the interests of peasants. However, Mao Zedong thought that taking the interests of farmers into account blindly was a policy of lesser benevolence, on the contrary, national modernization was a policy of greater benevolence, and it was necessary for the lesser benevolence to serve the greater benevolence. In addition, Zhou Enlai scolded Liang Shuming by enumerating his "consistent political reaction", which was the catalyst about the historical case.As an important institution for the majority democrats to participate in politics, Liang Shuming thought Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) wasn’t the absolute follower of the communist party of China, but the supervisor standing outside the government. Accepting the invitation of Mao Zedong, Liang Shuming became the member of national committee of CPPCC. It is inevitable that Liang Shuming was incompetent at his job, what’s more, Mao Zedong set Liang Shuming for negative example, so, he got criticized which was hardly avoided. Holding a stubborn personality, Liang Shuming was in a class by himself, who was dare to argue with the acknowledged leader, and it was no longer existence that Liang Shuming took the suicidal measures to participate in government and political affairs while we speak highly of his unyielding integrity.