Understanding Sympathy: Comment On The Outside Of The Central Soviet Area

Around1930, the Kuomintang and the battle is increasingly becoming the focus of publicattention at home and abroad.Under the leadership of the Communist Party and its revolutionarynature, Chinese Communist revolutionary and Soviet public life tense, how people’s mental state,how meaning ’ land of the CPC, aroused great concern and discussion.At the same time, alongwith the Kuomintang to Communist China "encirclement and suppression" operations has madethese problems even more puzzling.In a sense, actors recriminations on both sides, such as theKuomintang says the Communist "Reds", the Communist Party said the KMT for "white bandits",it is difficult to determine who to justice, which is really the key of revolution, onlookers watchoften have considerable objectivity.This article select30third party other than the party, liberal intellectuals and mainstreammedia, observation of the Chinese Communist revolution, land reform, as well as the Communistsand comment, with a view to obtaining between the Kuomintang and the "encirclement andsuppression" against "encirclement and suppression" objective understanding.The text is divided into five chapters, in addition to beyond the first chapter is an introductionto, and the second chapter describes the ideology of Central Soviet area in view, the so-calledideological perspective refers to the KMT and the Communist Party.The KMT says theCommunist "communist bandit", to the Central Soviet area "of suppressing bandits" militaryoperations, while the Communist Party said the KMT as "white"-that the Kuomintang-ledGovernment is a counter-revolutionary Government, was the traitorous Government.Chapter IIIdescribes the Central Soviet area from the perspective of a third party.Liberal intellectuals,non-governmental newspapers, journalists, and other relatively objective third party standing inthe standpoint of the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Communist revolution is differentfrom the KMT but also from the Communist Party’s views.The Ta Kung Pao, under theDeclaration, the benefits of mainstream non-governmental daily newspaper showed a limited"ambiguous" attitude, disagree with communism and the violent revolution on the one hand, andare able to find sympathy, understanding, in its editorial leadership of the Communist Party and itscentral Soviet area.As the Communist Party the Kuomintang was assailed by Ding Wenjiang andHu Shi’s liberal intellectuals are insisting on a political solution to the Chinese civil war the onlyway.The fourth chapter describes third-party awareness of the CPC construction in Central Sovietarea, including agrarian reform, advocacy and education, the women’s Liberation Movement andthe institution of marriage.The fifth chapter epilogue.The author summarizes the KMT and theCommunist Party and a third party to the Communist Party’s revolutionary attitude, analysis of thereason why the three different approaches to the same event.It can be seen that liberal intellectuals, public media and other third parties even though theydon’t agree with Marxist nor endorses violent revolution, but their sympathies for Communistrevolution to understand, some people even think that the CCP is just political enemies, opponentsshould not use force, should be a political solution.In their view, the PRC referred to China’surgent need to address the issue of land reform and land reform advocates is a reflection of China’seconomic and social root causes.