Mediating Effect In Frustration Stressors And Emotional Response

Since Psychologist Lazarus introduced the concept of response to stress and reaction model in1966. More and more psychologists began its keen interest, a lot of research to make the position and influence in the traditional research, response is thought to play an important role in stress process. However, research is mostly confined to the negative psychology academic. With the development of positive psychology, Researchers increased positive coping factors between frustration and reaction. Therefore, positive coping study play an important role in students’ frustration event evoked emotional reactions.This study selected5169archives in Institute of Psychology of Xi’an University of Petroleum as samples and then, selected the ratio of8%random sample of427people as the object of study. This study use "Student Life Stress Scale" and "The crisis approach Scale" to survey the students. To analyze the resulting data, Specific findings are as follows:(1) Boys choose to seek help and to control their emotions in two ways on the positive response was significantly lower than girls; In terms of the score of dealing with the problem, none-only child is higher than only child. In terms of controlling emotional score, arts students are significantly higher than engineering students.(2) In terms of the score of the guilt pain score, boys are significantly higher than girls. City college students scored significantly higher than rural students of college students in term of worry on anxiety dimension. Only child and non-only child showed no significant difference in terms of the emotional response to this dimension scores.(3) In term of frustrated, frustrated heterosexual contacts and opportunities refusal frustrated frustration, boys are significantly higher than girls. City college students scored significantly lower than rural students of college students in term of poverty and opportunity to refuse frustrated. Female college students of only child are significantly higher than female college Students of non-child students in term of poverty and opportunity to refuse frustrated. Family poor students are significantly higher than non-poor students in term of poverty and opportunity to refuse frustrated.(4) Students’emotional reactions are significantly associated with frustration stressors. In frustration stressors of college, Poverty of frustration is associated with emotional control. Frustrated excluded a significant negative correlation with handling problems. Exclusion and seeking support is also a significant negative correlation. College students deal with this positive coping ways which are significantly associated with angry anger, guilt, pain, sadness depression. Actively seek the support of this trouble coping with the emotional reactions of anxiety is significantly positively correlated.(5) Mediating effect in frustration stressors and emotional response is significant in dealing with this positive coping.