The Impact Of Note Symbols On The Accuracy Of C-E Consecutive Interpretation

This paper aims to discuss the relationship between the number of symbols used in the note of consecutive interpretation and the accuracy of the interpretation. The author conducts experiment on8examinees and analyzes their interpretation.In regards to theoretical framework, Roderick Jones pointed out in his work improve the efficiency of note-taking. But notes and symbols should not be seen as an end but only as a tool. Meanwhile, the author also introduces Gile’s effort model theory, in which Gile pointed out that consecutive interpretation consists of listening, analyzing, short-term memory and coordination. In Gile’s model, since the interpreter’s total efforts are limited, symbols can help the interpreters reduce the effort consumed in the first phase so that interpreters can put more emphasis on the output and improve the quality of the interpretation.Based on the context of the speech, the author establishes a marking standard, and notes down the number of symbols the examinees used. After data collection, scatter diagrams are chartered for further analysis. Based on the distribution, it can be seen that the accuracy of the interpretation is positively correlated with the number of symbols in the notes. But it is worth mentioning that the correlation is rather low. Thus, the conclusion can be drawn that the accuracy of the interpretation is not necessarily related to the number of symbols applied in the notes. However, during the interview, all the examinees admit that symbols are of great help for interpreters. So in the future, teachers should teach the students symbols; but the limitations of symbols should also be clarified.