| Granting is an essentially help to others. Granting virtue is regarded as a traditional virtue praised and widely spread by people from ancient times and get high social evaluation. from the point of view of evaluation in turn our society traditionally focus on social appraisal to social evaluation, pay attention to social benefits produced by granting and Moral demonstration and leading efforts to the people. But to a certain extent, it will bring the Deviation on evaluation if it just emphasize the Social effect, such as just ask consequence not motivation, just consider Social effect not Feelings of behavioral actors or just lay stress on Material interests not spiritual interests, etc. and then granting without a pretty good motive will given relatively high appraisals but not think much of granting with good motive but less benefit, which is a big blow to enthusiasm of the people who wants to grant. The key to these problems is that the evaluation method to granting is too single, just emphasize social consequence without regard to mental feelings of behavioral actors. It is Necessary to introduce the perspective of behavioral actors. Because the granting actors is themselves, the Sense of Self and the evaluation of Self will Directly affect the actor and the granting. The evaluation of Self mainly emphasize the motive and spiritual values. The goal is to conduct the actors grant further through stressing the positive and evaluation of self.So, this paper considers there are at least two ways to the evaluation of granting, one is social evaluation, another is self-evaluation. The focus is not the same, so the effect is different. But for granting, these two ways can’t interchangeable and biased, or there is a negative impact on granting. Even it may conduct that the people just value the motive of behavior rather than focus on the results. We hold that these two ways should complementary, which will more conducive to people to establish more right concept of wealth, put it in the right perspective and grant rightly. This is more conducive to promote social equity further. |