| Facial expressions, as one of the ways of emotional expression, is a important information source of individual understanding emotions, The ability to recognize emotions for individual interpersonal relationship and social adaptation plays a vital role, So for facial expression recognition research has important practical significance. In recent years, along with the emergence of the new concept of facial expression processing point-dimension, Many researchers from different aspects respectively investigates the background information for the influence of relative to identify facial expressions, and analyzes the personality, age, culture and other factors. Field cognitive style as one aspect of the personality dimensions, are important individual difference variable, and affect the individual cognitive activities, The facial expression recognition as a kind of cognitive activity, research field cognitive style influence on facial expressions relative identification has important theoretical and practical significance. Although researchers have surveyed the field cognitive style of facial expression recognition, but choose the experimental materials are isolated face, did not consider the factor of background, The field cognitive style of facial expression identification of the relative research is very little, so this study decided to further explore field cognitive style influence on relative recognize facial expressions, in order to make up for the inadequacy of such research.In this study includes two experiments, the experiment is a chosen yue jia luo revised Chinese happy mood in the image system and disgust, face and the international image of emotions in the happy scene and disgust as experimental material, the first experiment using three factors mixed design:The 2 (field cognitive style:field dependence and field independence) x 2 (scene:happy, disgust) x 2 (facial expressions:happy, disgust) repetitive measure analysis of variance, surveyed the field cognitive style of joy and hate emotional face relatively recognition. From accuracy, reaction time and intensity rating field cognitive style three aspects of pleasure and distaste for emotional faces such as the influence of the relative identification. Due to the particularity of neutral faces, the valence and arousal and emotional faces have a big difference, so the second experiment further using three factors mixed design:The 2 (field cognitive style:field dependence and field independence) x 2 (scenario:fear, neutral) x 2 (facial expressions:fear, neutral) repetitive measure analysis of variance, From two aspects of accuracy and reaction time was investigated field cognitive style affect the emotional faces relative identification.This research conclusions are as follows:1.The individuals of different cognitive style happy and dislike of facial expression recognition accuracy has appeared on "ceiling effect", no significant difference between the two. Different cognitive style individuals to neutral and fear of facial expression recognition accuracy, nature and background conditions of the interaction of the expression significantly, subjects under neutral scenes in a neutral expression recognition accuracy is higher than the neutral expression in fear scenario recognition accuracy, the difference significant, but fear expression in fear scenario recognition accuracy and expression under the neutral scene recognition accuracy, the difference was not significant.2.Under the condition of different background, field independent groups of participants reactions to happiness and disgust expression significantly shorter than the field dependence group, happy expression significantly shorter reaction time on the reaction of disgust expression, consistent face under the condition of reaction time significantly shorter than the inconsistent face under the condition of reaction time.3. In the same condition, the field dependence group of subjects on the strength of the facial expression score significantly higher than the field independence group, under the condition of inconsistent, field dependent group participants score was significantly lower than the strength of the facial expressions of the field independence group. |