| This paper discusses the concept, the development of administrative hearing system, thesignificance of its development, will be divided into the initial, development andimprovement in three phases. Pointed out that the current administrative hearing system inChina because of the influence of the imperfect laws and regulations, the administrativemain body subjective defects and administrative decision-making rule of ecological factors,its implementation and effectiveness and expectation of the people there is a certain gap. Thegap is mainly reflected in the administrative legislation hearing, the hearing on behalf ofneglect of identity fraud, hearing programmes serious homogeneity, results of the hearingson administrative decision-making influence is limited. The article puts forward clearly towant to continue to improve the administrative hearing system, we must attach greatimportance to the establishment of the theory of procedural justice and the core position inChina’s administrative hearing system, the justice of administrative laws and regulations toguide the continuous improvement of bridge building, communication between officials andthe public. Advocate the establishment of public hearing from the use of the theory ofprocedural justice, perfect the hearing laws and regulations legislative motion mechanism,perfect the hearing participants generating program, perfect hearing matters openinformation system, broaden the perfection of administrative hearing system of publichearings and improve administrative subject legal environment six aspects. Propose to the"one point two guarantees"--the thought of procedural justice as the starting point,supplemented by legislation and law enforcement security--for the people "the dream ofhearing " implementation escort. |