| Even the system of Urban management law enforcement has made enormouscontribution to China’s city management and greatly improved city appearance andenvironmental quality,but at the same time, there have been repeated criticism ofthem using excessive force. With the accelerated process of urbanization, the missionsassumed by the comprehensive enforcement agency have been increased gradually,and legal norms is not perfect, the powers and duties enjoyed are not uniform, so thecomprehensive enforcement agency has become a negative focus of public opinion.Because of the fact that members with the urban management agencies have beeninvolved in high-profile cases that highlighted public discontent towards a perceivedabuse of power by them. The legality of Urban management law enforcement hasbeen questioned. But at the same time, there have been repeated criticism of themusing excessive force. Because of the fact that members with the urban managementagencies have been involved in high-profile cases that highlighted public discontenttowards a perceived abuse of power by them. The legality of Urban management lawenforcement has been questioned. This article address the system’s existence andtakes concept analysis and contrast studies to described the problems of it.The legal legitimacy of the city’s comprehensive enforcement system has suffered aserious crisis, and its development met the bottlenecks. This paper attempts toresearch the legitimacy of the city’s comprehensive enforcement system to find out itsproblems. as a basis for their causes problems found in the city’s comprehensiveenforcement system, and find solutions to problems. Paper is divided into three parts:First, make a comprehensive analysis of system and the legitimacy of meaning, toclarify the context of the emergence and development of the system and sort out thelaw system. Second, find out the problems and the causes of the lack of legitimacy.Third, propose measures to address the problem solved. |
PDF Full Text Request