Study On The System Of Synchronous Videotape Recording Of Question By The Procuratorial Organ

The policy of synchronous videotape recording in interrogation, is a great moveof procuratorial organ’s investigative reforms to duty crimes, pushing the applicationof information construct and high-tech measures in procuratorial organ’s investigativeworks, and is great important to strengthen the supervision to interrogation, ensurethe legality of investigating and obtaining evidences, guarantee the legal right ofsuspect, avoid problems such as using torture to coerce a statement, and push thework of duty crimes investigation to develop deeply. After the4steps of practicewhich are initial exploration, carrying out step by step, putting into effect in anall-round way, and deepening development, procuratorial organ’s policy ofsynchronous videotape recording in interrogation has achieved noticeable success, butalso existing the following problems: first, at policy level, the legal nature ofsynchronous videotape recording in interrogation is not clear,,its scope of applicationstill needing adjustment, and "whole process" is not in a real sense, lacking relatedregulations of security measures; second, at practical operation level, the demand of"three quan" is not carried out in an all-round way. The operative procedure is notstandardize and the questioner’s ability could not reach demand, lacking a guaranty ofmoney and talent. The newly amended Criminal Procedure Law also legislate aboutsynchronous videotape recording in interrogation, which indicates that the effect ofthis policy to standardize law enforcement and guarantee human right has been highlyrecognized. This paper begins from basic theory of policy of synchronous videotaperecording in interrogation, interpreting the concept, characteristics, basic principleand meanings, combining our procuratorial organ’s practice of this policy in recentyears, and at policy and practical operation level, analyzes the problems of thispolicy in use, then brings about the flowing suggestions to perfect it: firstly, inlegislation, should clear the certifiable ability, regulate proper scope of application,redefine "whole procedure", and standardize the operative regulations and procedure;secondly, in practice, should implement this policy strictly, and improve the ability ofhandling duty crimes cases, as well as strengthening the basic guaranty of this policy.