Research Of Anti-Mltinational Commercial Bribery Law On United Kigdom And United States

This article is concerning the foreign corruptions of multinational companies, which sets the USA and UK enforcement agencies as the main bodies, and divide each part as artificial person and natural person. It generalizes the enforcement cases with numerous graphs, tables, and pick out some of the most representative cases to analysis. Summarize them in the light of the characteristics of each part, and express a clear silhouette of current transnational commercial bribery enforcement.From the enforcement methods that used by the agencies could represent they have convergence, which means SEC (USA) and SFO (UK) were part imitate the enforcement tools of DOJ (USA), to encourage multinational corporations voluntary report to them. As contrast the contents of DOJ’s NPA and DPA, it can be found the mitigation to be set as an incentive to make the companies compete with each other in self-report and cooperation with the agency. The process also shapes the innovation of enforcement tools.As UK devote in the enforcement field, it produce great impact to multinational corporations, and bring the agencies’coordination to international level.Though it still has varying degrees of difference among the three organizations’enforcement, but the main purpose can be summarized into two claims:Encourage and active the potential whistle blowers offer internal information to agencies; Guide, convince or compel transnational corporation build internal compliance system.Finally, regardless the China’s supervisor set what objective as the most important one; it should clearly recognize the international status among anti-bribery field, and would arouse what kind of potential risk to domestic listed companies or multinational corporations probably. Concerning whether them would be the target of foreign enforcement agencies, remind them to prevent the risks.