Explore The Land Acquisition And Resettlement In "Coordinating The Whole Village" Model

Since the reform and opening up policy, with sustained rapid economic development,urban construction and expansion velocity of the increasingly rapid urban development ofthe huge increase in demand for land, only to impose collective ownership of land by landrequisition system was able to meet their needs. Ever since, the “Bulldozer” as a symbolof the land acquisition and resettlement activities carried out in full swing across thecountry together. Common sense is concerned, this is a land acquisition activitiesconducive to people’s things, because the land acquisition will not only freed from theshackles of traditional farmers in the land, so that they are free to engage in otheroccupations to earn wealth of society, also to promote the prosperity in the region andbring new vitality and convenience to the lives of ordinary people. However, due to thecurrent lack of land acquisition management system, many people are difficult to enjoy thebenefits brought by the land acquisition, causing many farmers reluctant to landexpropriation, and even stopping the land with violence, self-mutilation and other extremeway. Currently, the emergence of these cases has been a serious threat to the stability andharmony of the whole society. At present, China ’s urbanization rate is only about45percent, according to expert estimates, in205075%of China’s urbanization rate will reach,say, the future of China’s urbanization process still requires lengthy land acquisitionmanagement systems and it will play a significant efficacy. There is no doubt; to explorethe new land management system has been imposed to be imperative. Shenzhen, asexplorers of the land acquisition management system, on the basis of practice, summed upa set of “coordinating the whole village “land acquisition management. Systematicanalysis of the model and the improvement of the land expropriation system havesignificant significance.In this paper, a number of subjects of public administration, management science,sociology, law and other basic theory, has been the bases of the analysis, using literatureanalysis, comparative analysis, the purpose of analysis and case study analysis and othermethods for in-depth understanding and analysis of The Land Management System thecurrent situation. On this basis, for the "whole village co-ordination" land acquisitionmanagement mode analysis, combined with aspects related to the management conceptforeign land expropriation, put forward the corresponding rationalization proposals. Themain contents and conclusions are as follows: Part I: From the first chapter to chapter II, mainly related to the overview of the basicknowledge of writing this article. The first chapter focuses on the research background andsignificance, research and research ideas and relevant domestic and international review;second chapter describes the basic concept of " coordinating the whole village " model,compared with the traditional model and urban renewal; At the same time, involves in thefour basic theories of the land management system, including the interests of the gametheory, cooperation theory, the theory of public participation and co-ordination theory, aswell as the positive role of the four the basic theory in " coordinating the whole village "model.Part II: chapter III, they are mainly pointing out the problems and analyzing thereasons.Part III: Chapter IV, it is mainly on the relevant aspects of the experience of foreignland acquisition management system, for example: the United States, Britain, Japan, andSingapore. Carefully compare the four countries from a legal basis for expropriationprocedures, compensation standards and dispute resolution approaches.Part IV: From Chapter V to VI, it is mainly around the framework of the “wholevillage co-ordination" mode. Chapter VII analyzes the six major innovations of the“coordinating the whole village", background, status, content, and dig out the flaws of the“coordinating the whole village” model. Based on the above, mainly combines relevantoverseas experience and put forward relevant experience for lack of “coordinating thewhole village" model.Part V: Conclusion, emphasize again the significance "coordinating the wholevillage" model for the management system for land expropriation. At the same time,according to the above recommendations, the model of "coordinating the whole village"also need to improve its own system construction as soon as possible to guide the smoothof the land acquisition.