The Research Of People’s Mediation And Judicial Mediation Linkage Mechanism In Fukang Xinjiang

Since the reform and opening up, different regions,different industries, different interest groups vary, which not only brought great vitality to the economic and social development, but also inevitably lead to social conflicts. Diversification of conflicts and disputes inevitably requires the establishment of a wide range of conflicts and disputes resolve channels. In 2008, Fukang City established a convergence mechanism of "people’s mediation " and "judicial mediation" (hereinafter referred to as "convergence mechanism"), thus set up a "viaduct" between justice and the people’s mediation by systems, and achieved the diversification of conflicts and disputes resolve, which is the first case of practice in the region. After years of practice, although the convergence mechanism played an active role in settling some of the conflicts and disputes, but there are still many problems.This text taking The convergence mechanism of People’s Mediation and judicial mediation of Fukang City for the study, using the methods of literature researching, investigation,and comparison, analysed the causation and the background that emerge "convergence mechanism", the development status and operational aspect as well as the prominent issues and the resion of it. According to the study, we found out that due to The convergence mechanism of People’s Mediation and judicial mediation of Fukang City lack of unified leadership mechanism, fund guarantee, the impact of the concept of bias, awareness and some other reasons, caused three kids of problems as follows:The system is not implemented, convergence is not smooth, inadequate staffing agencyand as well as the mediation system is not well-recognized. In this paper, combining the actual of Fukang City, on the basis of learning from inland pilot areas of domestic experience, to improve the "convergence mechanism"system, we gives three suggestions:First, strengthen the top-level design, build leadership mechanism; second is to optimize the mediation organization, improve the quality of mediators; the third one is transform ideas, and increase funding guarantee.