The Research On Trial Public In The Era Of New Media

The basic connotation of our country judicial public extends from the initial trial audit to the file public, trial public, execution public, hearings public, clerical public and ShenWu public, the evolution process changes from single to multiple, from simple to complex, which reflectes the effectiveness of judicial reform and the progress of civilization in our country. Judicial public has the function of securing the citizens’ democratic rights including the right to know, to participate, to express and to supervise, and promote justice, maintain the rights and interests of the parties, standardize judicial practices, improve the level of judicial democracy, these functions are also the direction which judicial public should adhere to in the era of new media. The judicial authorities should deal with the relationship among judicial public and judicial supervision, judicial independence, secret of trial, which is also a proposition judicial public in the era of new media needing to focus on grasping. New media communication has the openness, interactivity, individuality and textual features, whose development scale and speed beyond imagination, these characteristics deeply affects the content and the way of judicial public, extendes the connotation of judicial public, expandes the effect of judicial public, increases the difficulty of judicial public, puts forward higher requirements on the judicial public, so for the judicial public, the application of new media communication mode is both opportunity and challenge. The judicial organs from the Supreme Court to grass-roots court in our country attach great importance to judicial public in the era of new media, carry out many beneficial explorations including the website construction, written judgment network openness, trial live, weibo and micro letter opened, etc. But judicial public in the era of new media is not unobstructed, judicial public in the era of new media has the problems of the new media supervision anomie, judicial subject failures andnegative public opinion out of control, the causes are complex, related to the propagation characteristics of new media and conservative of thinking the judicial organs. Revealing the problems and causes aimes at improving Suggestions, improving judicial public in the era of new media should not only adhere to the scientific principles and requirements, set up correct concept of public, improve the judicial staff publicly ability, improve the function of the new media public platform, and carry out from details, establish the interaction mechanism of the judicial supervision and judicial public, and establish public opinion and crisis management mechanism. The judicial public in the era of new media is an emerging thing, which needs constant exploration and research.