Research On Authority Of Forensic Technology

In China, as evidence of the judicial system and identification of technical arrangements, the reason can be recognized by the public, the key reason is that they establish authority.Evidence Identification technology brings authority can be divided into two kinds of hard and soft, hard authority refers to the technology itself, including its content and relevance of research deeper, soft power is credibility, the credibility is a subjective thing, But it comes from the hard objective authority, that the real power of criminal science. Soft authoritative evidence identification technology is one important manifestation of the judicial authority, its authority has its own whether contains a higher, more scientific, more rational, more in line with the quality of the program and other closely related technical foundation up. By extension, the public authority to establish, in contemporary China, has developed to such a situation:the existing authority of the identity model including the original deity worship of nature are long gone, but the threat of violence against the state apparatus, the main identity, or other authoritative third-party security pattern recognition gradually weakened its effectiveness, replaced by a confirmation from the system and due to the rational process. Generally, evidence identification technology itself should represent a rational and authoritative, but not so in practice, in addition to the technology itself and establish a level factors, but also with the level of quality of its management technology platforms related to their public authority. Therefore, the provision of evidence identification technology organizations to establish and optimize the quality management system to be able to enhance the identification of related parties for evidence management technologies and their organizational authority recognized laboratory fundamentally.For a long time, as the public security system inside the forensic science laboratories, primarily related to an order to obtain evidence or to verify the credibility of the evidence and scientific identification platform, currently being challenged by other third-party accreditation bodies on the market, its authority manifestation of a certain impact. The main source of the problem is due to the organization and management model has been confused with the general administrative system, independent of the quality management system has not formed an organizational framework, it is necessary to study how new quality management through other ways, such as laboratory accreditation for change, which is help improve the quality of management efficiency, shorten the service period, in terms of quality management to the requirements of modern management in line with international standards and to snapping, and ultimately improve their soft authority.In the present study, the S City Public Security Bureau forensic science laboratories as an example, the use of public management theory in theoretical authority, due process and comprehensive quality management theory and methods to sort out, introduced by accredited laboratory quality management system, and pointed out that the existing technical problems in the management system, to try to draw some response measures, so as to macro-management departments, administrative departments of government laboratories, as well as direct support unit managers to improve management practices to enhance public authority and the ability to provide a reference, provide a reference for the construction and improvement of the organization of criminal science laboratory management system, and thus in-depth understanding of the importance of soft power evidence Identification technology.