In this paper, through the analysis of Feng, ran a abuse cases, there are three controversial focus:first, Feng, ran a whether constitutes the crime; second, Feng, ran a charge dispute; third, Feng, ran a whether to set up a common crime. Through the analysis of the focus of controversy that:first, Feng, ran a constitute a crime; second, Feng, ran a State-Owned Company staff abuse of power crime; third, Feng, ran a common crime. Thinking through the analysis of Feng, ran a abuse cases arising out:first, the characteristics of our country state-owned enterprise personnel job-related crimes:the crime forms, the quantity of crime is rising, involving increased; the incidence of industry covers a wide range of personnel involved in the complexity of identity; crime means two level differentiation serious; nest on crime shows characteristics, social. Second reasons, China’s state-owned enterprise personnel duty crime:economic operation system and management mechanism loopholes; the enterprise internal management is not standard, the lack of effective supervision of power; system of law of prevention of duty crime is not perfect; lack of legal concept, the consciousness of self-discipline is not strong. Third, China’s state-owned enterprise personnel duty crime prevention to do:to strengthen the legislation of duty crime; perfecting supervision mechanism of power operation; strengthen the legal concept, improve the quality of personnel of state-owned enterprises; seriously investigate and deal with illegal cases. |