China Policy Analysis Abe Two Administrations Reign

Relations between China and Japan in Asia, is always a not open around the topic. Direct manifestation of bilateral relations, the relationship between the leaders of the foreign policy of every country. In 2006, Abe became the first Japanese prime minister, the need for domestic and foreign policies, Abe positive attempt to adjust its China policy different from the past. And previously served as Prime Minister of the obvious differences, for the first time during the reign of Abe adjust its China policy, there is a need not only strategic, but there are also domestic political considerations. With Abe’s visit to China-Japan high-level interaction and accelerate political exchanges between China and Japan to pick up signs. Accompanied by the temperature of the case back to Abe to China’s foreign policy, relations between the two countries have gradually warmed up. However, Abe Cabinet crisis in being the next state cabinet scandals, resigned leaving office less than a year. Until 2012, after a lapse of six years before the project, poised to become Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe again. After this stage, Abe did not continue on a moderate foreign policy toward China during the first ruling, but the sword easy road, towards the direction of tough diplomacy. Stressed that the US-Japan alliance partnership, on the Diaoyu Islands issue and Yasukuni Shrine showed rightwing hawks logo sex. Such changes worthy of attention, their different foreign policy toward China during the two administrations in power, but also the performance of Abe’s political thought.By Abe two government policy toward China during the reign of the analysis, help to further understand the Abe government is in power today’s China policy and its development. Through the analysis of some regularity, features and organize the event, adjustment of China’s policy toward Japan, a positive response from many angles, and ultimately create a good situation for sustainable development, enhance political and strategic advantages of China to Japan.This article is divided into three parts:First, the introduction section. Mainly elaborates research purpose, meaning, the way to the literature review, presentation on stage twice Shinzo Abe’s China policy research status. The basic idea put forward and the main research method.Second, the body part. By political, economic, military, were elaborated on various policy Shinzo Abe to China during the reign of the two governments, from the first visit, a positive patch in Japan diplomatic relations, put forward two "strategic reciprocity" program; "political and economic separation" The political idea that the Sino-Japanese political and economic relations differentiation; to clear tough foreign attitude, emphasizing the US-Japan alliance, aggressive on the Diaoyu Islands issue. Changing circumstances Shinzo Abe’s China policy two governments, as well as the factors behind the change, including analysis. Discussion In Japan Abe’s government to change the situation in China policy, China should start from what point of view, to deal with all sorts of positive change.The third part Concludes the paper, and the conclusions. Summary Abe Administration’s China policy two reasons for the change, change is the impact of Sino-Japanese economic status, changes in the US strategy toward China, the Japanese rightist politics of intensified development and transformation of the Japan International Strategic Thinking these four aspects. In the face of changes in Japan’s Shinzo Abe to China two government policies, China should take timely response method, setting long-term strategy. On the one hand the two countries should, in the spirit of the four political documents, entered into a strategic relationship of mutual trust, through properly negotiated settlement of historical issues; on the other hand, "mutually beneficial relationship based on common strategic interests, " the two sides should continue to develop strategic and mutually beneficial. relations in bilateral and multilateral cooperation to promote the comprehensive development of mutual benefit.