The Use Of Socialist Deliberative Democracy In The Construction Of A Harmonious Relationship

With the continued development of the deepening of reform,the economic and social interests of our landscape has undergone enormous changes the relationship between cadres showed good momentum of development, but it should be noted that in some areas is still very tense between cadres, groups escalating events, petitions continued to increase, cadres prestige declined. The relationship between cadres and the masses are facing new challenges and tests. Third Plenary Session of 18 th CCP emphasize the Communist Party of China as an important manifestation of the mass line in the political, economic, cultural and other fields, new ideas and new ways to do the masses of cadres in the new context of the work. The so-called deliberative democracy, civil liberties refer to legally equal rights of citizens under the country’s democratic constitution based on standardized conditions, rational to engage, discussion, consultation and other activities, and ultimately come to a unified conclusion or making a legitimate form of democratic decision-making activities. Therefore, the establishment improvement of effective working of democracy, can make the leading cadres in the implementation of the Party’s mass line in practice, constantly optimize the use of deliberative democracy approach work methods to improve the style of work, and actively promote the broad participation of the masses of the people closely related thereto social affairs decisions, giving the people fully enjoy the public interest decision-making power, improving public governance correctness and satisfaction. Meanwhile, the cadres and masses in the process of interaction, the enhanced mutual trust, resolve conflicts between cadres and promote the sound development of the relationship between cadres. Therefore, how to understand, recognize deliberative democracy between cadres connotation treatment, how to have a correct understanding of its history and development issues, and how to better promote its rapid development of China’s socialist democracy and other issues that need to be considered and resolved by the development of issue. The full text is divided into five chapters.The first chapter is the introduction, this paper describes the background, significance of the topic and research methods, etc., through the use of multi-disciplinary comprehensive analysis, historical literature, comparative analysis, systems analysis and other methods, the use of political science the relevant theory to analyze the role of the socialist deliberative democracy in dealing with the relationship between cadres.The second chapter is to correctly handle the relationship between cadres of Necessity. Issues and challenges through research between cadres meaning and significance of the relationship between cadres facing the development of three aspects of handling the relationship between cadres to explain the necessity of correctly handle the relationship between cadres.The third chapter is deliberative democracy dealing with the relationship between cadres theoretical basis. This chapter in-depth analysis and studies were Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping at the core of the theory of deliberative democracy deal with the relationship between cadres and content, and to provide a theoretical basis for further research to support deliberative democracy handling masses.The fourth chapter is about the application of deliberative democracy in the relationship between government officials and masses. By analyzing the characteristics of deliberative democracy deal with the relationship between cadres way, put the essence of deliberative democracy, namely maximizing the people are the masters.The fifth chapter problems faced deliberative democracy deal between cadres and Countermeasures. For deliberative democracy deal with the difficulties and problems exist between cadres, raised the question of advice: pay attention to the role of democratic negotiation between cadres of treatment; smooth forms of grassroots consultations democratic channels; promoting deliberative extensive multi-institutional development; creating Deliberative Democracy Development enabling environment; to increase the intensity of the cadres and masses education groups; strengthen consultation and dialogue between cadres.