Research On Regularization Of Judge Group

October 23, 2014, "the CPC Central Committee decided to comprehensively promote the rule of law on a number of important issues," clearly requires the construction of high-quality special team of law, promote the rule of law special team regularization, specialization, professionalization. Where the law specifically refers to the team legislative, administrative law enforcement, the judiciary, in the text to emphasize larger space judges and prosecutors. Thus, the legal people, whether for academic research point of view or from the perspective of the country’s political life,it is necessary to judge the team regulations careful study. This article identifies the meaning of regularization, clear links and differences between professionalization and other similar concepts. And distinguished team of judges and court team regularization. From the theoretical point of view for the first time put forward the concept of regularization issues. It proposed five criteria formalized, including independence, democracy, standards, modern and high-quality. And relevant specific system made a useful exploration, in accordance with its inherent laws will be divided by system personnel system, accountability system, and job security system consisting of collation and analysis. For possible problems in normalized try to answer the question, including the regularization of the contingent of judges relationship with ideology; and normalization capabilities and flexibility judge issues; and legal and social effects of unification issues, etc.. From the new field start with the intention to fill gaps related research. In traditional research methods both problems listed above plus solutions increased by a detailed analysis of the results and evaluation criteria for such judgments contingent of judges normalized levels, to clarify the intent of the relevant theoretical knowledge, so logically successful.