The Research About The Role Of Local Government In The Reform Of State-owned Enterprises: From Administrative Leading To The Market

Reform of state-owned enterprises as an important part of China’s economic reform, has gone through several rounds of reform..With the central and provincial, municipal level of government belongs to state-owned enterprises assets of high quality, high level scale, financial contribution to the local big state-owned enterprises present situation is different, where the provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions in our country’s municipal government faced by state-owned enterprises are often small and scattered, scale level is not high, competitiveness is not strong, weak management, reliance on local government also enhanced. The eighteenth big strategic requirements are put forward for a new round of reform of state-owned enterprises,then as the vanguard of the national reform of Shanghai first opened the prelude of the local state-owned enterprises reform. For municipal government, the reform of state-owned assets for the same urgent, the development of state-owned enterprises mission is the same. The paper combining with the case in the reform of state-owned enterprises, the district government ever to municipal government as the object, summarizes and induces the government in promoting soe reform on its own positioning and analyzed the problems existing in the role of government in the new round of reform of state-owned enterprises is put forward Suggestions of countermeasures. This paper consists of six chapters:The first chapter introduced the selected topic background and significance, literature review and research methods and contents.The second chapter summary of relevant theories, mainly on the reform of state-owned enterprises, the role of government defining the relevant concepts, this paper expounds the role of government and the relationship of state-owned enterprises, and introduces the study theory of western countries.The third chapter fengxian government executive dominance in the state-owned enterprises reform. Fengxian government to promote the reform of state-owned enterprises in the actual situation as the object, to illustrate how early in the reform of state-owned enterprises, the government through administrative leading to reform. But the government administrative way leading reform have appeared in the intervention at the same time. Such as reduce the inequality in the time of decentralization, When the property right reform policy support, with mandatory and too much, Until now the government and the enterprises didn’t distinguish, government on the management of the enterprise also intervention from time to time. The main reason is the government leading enterprise way of thinking, "informal institution" dependence and local interests drive.The fourth chapter fengxian the reform of state-owned enterprises supervision system is not sound. In fengxian district as an example, the current situation of state-owned enterprises,Of the soe reform more than 30 years but on regulation is still not in place.The imperfection of the loss of state-owned assets, the company’s corporate governance, the contradiction between "regulatory investor" and "sponsor", external regulation not value, assets operation efficiency is not high.The existence of "soft budget constraint" become a mere formality, the modern enterprise system, the multiple roles positioning of regulators, external regulatory demands low is the main reason.The fifth chapter is to local government role positioning suggestion in a new round of reform of state-owned enterprises. One is deepening the system reform, optimize the assets layout, ready to guide the reform of state-owned enterprises. First, it need to clear the functions of the government and the market. Secondly to optimize assets layout and scientific classification, clear background and through the top design and strategic planning, to clear out, integration to create conditions such as restructuring, classified according to the standard measures such as to promote the reform. Two is to weaken the administrative color, strengthen internal management, to let go of the reform of state-owned enterprises.On the one hand, to strengthen the basis of enterprise management; On the other hand we should to try out market with the mechanism and the scientific and reasonable mechanism of incentive and constraint to increase the enterprise vitality. Three is to optimize regulation mode, perfecting the supervision system, the supervisor of state-owned assets.First must clearly state party committee supervision function, secondly to give play to the role of corporate governance institutions balance regulation;Then to play good sasac regulatory responsibilities;Finally to establish effective external supervision mechanism in public.