| Objective The effects of Qigong Baduanjin on quality of life in patients withhypertension and autonomic responses to be innestigated.then providing the retical bacisfor the application of Qigong Baduanjin scientific fitness and health care.Methods To patients diagnose with hupertension in Kailuan General Hospital during2012.3-2012.9were selected. According to inclusion criteria,all the patients divided in2group randomly: intervention group or control group patients met the inclusioncriteria were randomly assigned to the intervention group and the control, the patients incontrol group received routine blood pressure medication, meantime health guidance(low salt low fat diet, regular exercise, but exercise time for movement form is notrequired)was provided, the patients in intervention group were exercised Baduanjincalcined ponctice based on24-week regular used of antihypertensive drugs and healthguidance.the patients in the intervention group measured heart rate, breathing, bloodpressure at the points of the first day,12weeks,24weeks.at the same time follow-upinformation on hypertension-related complications, and at the points of the first week,24weeks, patients in were recieved both groups treadmill exercise test, had giving ECGmonitoring was during treadmill exercise test. measuring heart rate after treadmillexercise test, respiration, blood pressure, and collect the maximum heart rate, respiration,blood pressure returned to normal by the time must be obtained. HRV analysis softwarepackages by ECG. Respectively, before the experiment and after24weeks Baduanjinintervention using the SF-36quality of life assessment in patients with hypertension.. Allthe data entered into the computer, Excel software to establish a database, variousindicators of data input SPSS17.0statistical analysis software obtained experimental datato design one-way ANOVA(P<0.05), a statistically significant difference.Results1the intervention and control groups had no difference in the basic data (P>0.05) compared to each variable.2Ba Duan Jin exercise on the impact of quality of lifein patients with hypertension results analysis, no difference in the two groups before theintervention, the intervention group after their relatively PF, RP, BP, VT, GH, SF scoresof the existence of a significant difference (P<0.05), the intervention group comparedwith the control group PF, RP, BP, VT dimension scores were significantly different (P<0.05).3After24weeks Baduanjin intervention group before and after theintervention itself and the immediate comparative static systolic blood pressure, diastolicblood pressure, pulse pressure, heart rate, respiration was significantly decreasedsignificantly (P<0.05); After the intervention group compared with the control group ofstatic and immediate systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure,heart rate, respiration were significantly decreased (P<0.05).4After24weeks Baduanjinintervention group before and after the intervention itself more able insisting thattreadmill exercise test and adhere to the time of completion of treadmill exercise weresignificantly increased, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); interventiongroup after completion of treadmill exercise can keep the number of experiments andadhere to treadmill exercise group compared with the control time were significantlyincreased, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).5the intervention groupHRV frequency Domain indicators VLF, LF, LF/HF, lower than the control group,which groups the LF/HF index there are significant differences (P<0.05). Theintervention group after the frequency domain HRV indexes TP, HF control group, inwhich the two groups on HF, indicators exist significant differences (P<0.05).6After24weeks of intervention Baduanjin peak systolic, diastolic peak, peak heart rate, peakbreathing there are significant differences in their exercise treadmill test when comparingbefore and after the intervention group (P<0.05), systolic blood pressure after treadmillexercise test, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, breathing recovery time weresignificantly different (P<0.05). When the intervention group compared with the controlgroup treadmill exercise test peak systolic, diastolic peak, peak heart rate, respirationpeak there is a significant difference (P<0.05) after the intervention, after treadmillexercise test systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate recovery timeThere were significant differences (P<0.05), while no significant respiratory recoverytime difference (P>0.05).7while the peak breathing, no difference in peak diastolic blood pressure (P>0.05), onlythe female population peak diastolic differences (P<0.05), while the peak breathing, peaksystolic pressure, peak heart rate was no difference (P>0.05).8stratified by age eventafter stimulation, the intervention group and the control group each index recovered tothe level before the event to stimulate the comparative age <60years old populationsystolic blood pressure, respiration, heart rate from peak levels return to pre-stimulustime events were less than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Age>60years old crowd only systolic heart rate recovery from the peak to the level before the time of the event stimulating than the control group, the difference wasstatistically significant (P<0.05). The intervention group and the control group peakindicators compare age <60years old population peak systolic pressure, peak heart ratedifference was statistically significant (P<0.05), age>60years the population peaksystolic pressure difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).9stratified accordingto blood pressure levels after stimulation event, the intervention group and the controlgroup each index recovered to the level before the event to stimulate a relativelyhypertension systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate returned tonormal time from the peak is less than the control group, the difference There wasstatistically significant (P<0.05).2systolic hypertension only from the peak to thenormal recovery time is less than the control group, the difference was statisticallysignificant (P<0.05). The intervention group and the control group peak indicatorscompare a peak systolic hypertension, diastolic peak, peak heart rate difference wasstatistically significant (P<0.05), whereas no difference in peak respiration, two peaksystolic hypertension, the peak diastolic blood pressure, peak heart rate difference wasstatistically significant (P <0.05), whereas no difference peak breathing.10before theintervention group and the control group the researchers compared levels of Angâ…¡ wasno difference (P>0.05), after24weeks of BaDuanJin exercise, the researchers comparethe level of Angâ…¡ own intervention group and the intervention group compared with thecontrol group were significantly difference (P<0.05).Conclusion1Baduanjin exercise can improve endurance events in hypertensivepatients, improve the quality of life in patients with hypertension.2Baduanjin longexercise in patients with hypertension can enhance resting autonomic regulatory function,and can improve blood pressure in patients with autonomic reaction event stimuli. |
PDF Full Text Request