The Interpersonal Communication Online And Practical Interpersonal Communication Of College Students

The theme of this paper is the influence of College Students’ online game on interpersonal communication.In this study, the university students in four colleges in East China Normal University, Guizhou University, Beijing Normal University,Lanzhou University, etc., for the questionnaire, for college students the reality of interpersonal behavior influence factor to carry on the quantitative analysis.First, draw lessons from the network game interpersonal situation questionnaire, realistic interpersonal behavior questionnaire, the network game interpersonal negative results,the network game interpersonal social perception, the network game interpersonal self exposure and emotional experience, the network game interpersonal to cognition,network game interpersonal information learning these five dimensions to explore the network game interpersonal situation.From six angles of communication scope,intercourse time, trust feeling, the way of dealing with people, communication behavior and self understanding, this study discusses the situation of the actual interpersonal communication behavior.Second, to explore the influencing factors of College Students’ interpersonal behavior, and to verify the results of the research conclusions.Statistical analysis methods include descriptive statistical analysis,reliability and validity test, multiple regression analysis method.From the model test results, the frequency of college students to play online games, the negative results of interpersonal interaction on the real impact of interpersonal interaction is the most significant and stable;the social perception of online games also has a strong explanatory power for college students’ interpersonal communication behavior;in addition, the specialty, the network game interpersonal self exposure and emotional experience, interpersonal cognition also have different explain effects;but the grade and online game information learning have no significant role to the interpretation of the six types of practical interpersonal behavior.