Scholastic Attainment Evaluation About Academic Master Of Curriculum And Teaching Methodology

Early 21 st Century in China, is the comprehensive construction period of well-off society,a economic restructuring period, a talent structure reconstruction period,a first-class university and high level universities created period. Quality of higher education level becomes the fulcrum lever of the special period of the development of all walks of life. The quality of graduate students in higher education has become a key point in it. However, it’s problematic for higher educational evaluation,such as the value of quality assessment orientation deviation, the value standard vague, the evaluation mechanism isolated, the evaluation technology one-sided, the evaluation behavior careless insufficiency,and so on. The thesis chose S school as a case, to interpret and examine gains and losses in the curriculum and instruction of academic master’s academic achievement evaluation system for postgraduate academic systematically,and then provide rational thinking and suggestions for training high-level professional personnel.The thesis text is divided into five parts.Section one, combing through a range of concepts,we can see that evaluation of academic achievement, academic achievement assessment,and academic achievement measurement is different.The evaluation is about the value judgment,the assessment is to identify the screening,and the measurement is a way.Academic achievement evaluation is a more comprehensive evaluation, but not comprehensive quality evaluation,and content in the latter is more comprehensive, including congenital and acquired physical quality and psychological quality. The academic achievement evaluation of curriculum and teaching is to measure the level of theoretical study,scientific research, professional practice, professional affection,which helps to graduates’ development.Section two, teasing apart several evaluation values, namely the selection of orientation, product orientation, goal orientation, social utility orientation, and human-centered orientation.In scholastic attainment evaluation practice, there are many problems,for example,the existence of social evaluation instead of academic evaluation,evaluation practice deviation evaluation theory, evaluation content off evaluation form,which is because the college lies in external quality evaluation of inertia extension,and multiculturalism creates conflicts among different assessment subjects,moreover,goal orientation for the appraisal value of the subject of evaluation plays a large part.The academic achievement must return to the essence of education, based on the cultivation of talent and talent development.Section three,this essay intends to analyze academic achievement rational standard,existing problems and reasons,and put forward the idea of rational standard. Rational criteria of academic achievement evaluation standard characteristics has the rationality of structure, clear hierarchy, epochal character and operability. The current academic achievement evaluation criteria is conservative, vague, poor landing,that is due to lacking in communication between the higher education system and other social subsystems,and management thinking inertia effect.The talent evaluation of academic achievement includes moral standards and professional quality standards, the former includes moral quality, ideological and political quality, legal quality and psychological quality,and the latter involves mastering professional knowledge, full of professional affection and possessing professional ability,among them,the standard of professional research ability is the core.Section four,the academic achievement evaluation system of implementation mechanism has the inner drive system of its own, the implementation of independent organizations and implementation rules, the implementation of specific personnel, and maintain communication with external training system.There are many problems like lacking of implementation of the implementation mechanism in operation, and lack of support, separating from cultivation in university,that is due to the administrative inertia constraints, evaluation of the implementation of stakeholders and many conflicts of interests crisscross, the influence mechanism of graduate education cost sharing.Based on this, the effective operation of academic achievement evaluation implementation mechanism needs to coordinate the evaluation of the main The interests of the body,straighten out the end of the semester awards, mid-term examination, the relationshipbetween the evaluation of graduation, and close support and training.Section five,academic achievement evaluation method of technology is the value orientation in the context of the method, technical method. The way is main to solve application problems, and the technical methods is to solve the efficiency problem. In a certain value, in specific situations, both methods and technology have advantages and disadvantages. In the construction of academic achievement evaluation platform,evaluation standard, evaluation of development tools, sufficient way and technique is very important.The academic achievement evaluation method including quantitative method and qualitative method, the former is scientific,which excessive use will ignore people ’ s development,the latter focus on authenticity, however, relatively strong subjectivity, that is easy to make the academic achievement evaluation activities become an empty talk. Therefore, in the evaluation of academic achievement, comprehensive consideration is so vital.This study begins with the practice of researchers achievement assessment process,based on the curriculum theory and teaching practice of academic achievement evaluation, to provide a kind of thinking and operation possibility, in order to promote the realization of academic master’s academic achievement assessment of function of cultivation.