Measurement And Analysis Of National Innovation Systems In China

In just the past 2014 about what is the hottest Word the economy? Of course answer may not be the only, but definitely top three qualify for the transformation and upgrading. In fact, since a new Government took office, issues relating to China’s economic transformation and upgrading of more and more importance to the State and society, economic transformation and upgrading of China’s direction has also been fixed in innovation-driven development, innovation is considered to be support the main driving force of China’s future economic development. Therefore, in recent years the study on national innovation system has been more up, but due to our relatively late in this research, theoretical basis is weak, so for the more theoretical aspects of research of national innovation system, relatively few empirical studies.Based on the two-stage model of national innovation systems, first of all, longitudinal analyses since 1996 to 2012 from 17 years of six indicators reflecting national innovation trends, came to the conclusions of the national innovation system and constantly improve; Then select from a horizontal perspective developed G7 countries and by representatives of developing countries representatives of the "BRICS" as a reference object, horizontal analysis of the status quo of China’s national innovation system were obtained at this stage of China’s national innovation system’s input and output levels in between the G7 countries and the BRIC countries, slightly higher than the average of the BRIC countries, far below the average for G7 countries concluded.Second, paper to United States, and United Kingdom, and Canada, and Italy, and Japan, and Germany, and France, and Russia, and Brazil, and India and China for decision unit, using Max DEA6.3 software, measuring and analysis has 2003 to 2012 China national innovation system of first stage efficiency and second stage efficiency, and obtained has China national innovation system first stage efficiency in non-effective State, and second stage efficiency in effective State of conclusions.Again, to more accurate of find effects national innovation system efficiency of key factors, paper will enterprise, and College and Government of development personnel and development funding separate as alone of inputs indicators, more reasonable of set national innovation system efficiency evaluation indicators, using DEA improved method of introduced, using DEA6.3 software, on caused China national innovation system first stage invalid of factors for measure, and obtained has in Government, and enterprise and College three big inputs subject in the, Government aspects of single factors efficiency value is minimum of, Followed by companies and universities, and also means that government investment in research and development of relative over-supply, Government, industry and university research spending has not been configured properly.Finally, for the question of how to further improve China’s national innovation system put forward the following four proposals: first, to further strengthen the input of research and development resources. Secondly, the reform of the science and technology management system, improve the level of management of science and technology. Third, defining the function of innovation orientation, promoting mutual coordination and cooperation between innovation, formation of Government-led enterprises as the main body, in colleges and universities based on market-oriented pattern of combination of good scientific and technological innovation. Finally, from legislation, the reform of the scientific research personnel’s salary system, establishing the Office of unified management of scientific research funds, as well as four aspects of open information platforms for scientific research to further improve the management system of research funding.