| With the development of tourism and economic level, the tourist tastes of people are constantly upgrading, folklore tourism at home and abroad set off a boom. The current study focused on folk tourism in the region for a particular kind of folk tourism resources, functional value, with the characteristics of research and development related to policy or a particular type of folk classification and evaluation of tourism resources, yet for folk tourism resources to establish a unified classification and evaluation system. Current folklore tourism resource classification and evaluation widely used in May 2003 the national standard GB Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine was released/T18972-2003 "tourism resource classification, investigation and evaluation" (hereinafter referred to as "GB"). The "GB" for classification of all tourism resources, evaluate and develop, and therefore applies to folklore tourism resource classification, there are many problems in the evaluation, it is difficult scientific and rational system of folk tourism resources classification, investigation and development of evaluation the study.On the analysis of previous research results, the analysis of existing research and evaluation of the national standard classification of tourism resources related to folklore, folk tourism resources for the characteristics, the initial construction of the classification system and evaluation system folklore tourism resources, reference evaluation criteria related to folk literature and related cultural heritage tourism, select the evaluation folk tourism resources, through consultants, using AHP to determine the index weight, build a system of folk tourism resources evaluation system; final selection Cangshan this long history, rich folklore tourism resources area, as empirical research area, its folklore tourism resource classification, evaluation, based on the evaluation results of the status quo Cangshan folk tourism resources development and existing problems analysis, and proposed future the direction of their folklore tourism resource development. |