A Study On Regulation Of State-Owned Quality Inspection Agency By The Chinese Government

State-owned quality inspection agency as institution of the nature of technical service, assume the task of product random inspection and commissioned inspection. They play an important role in ensuring product quality and safety in the country. With the continuous advance of the reform of institutions, the government’s decentralization allowed state-owned quality inspection agency to participate in market competition and generate income. However, state-owned quality inspection agency unlike others, they are the result of planned economy and highly centralized administrative system. They and government regulators have a complicated relationship between interest. But, the regulation of quality inspection agency executive one standard. Ignoring the special nature made quality is difficult to guarantee. How to improve government regulation as soon as possible? How to improve regulatory quality? These problems seem very urgent under the frequent accidents in the quality and safety.This paper starts from the theory of government regulation and asymmetric information to research government regulation of state-owned quality inspection agency. Combining with current regulatory practice, summing outstanding regulation achievements, analyzing problems and reasons, thus targeted regulatory measures. It’s ultimately purpose to improve the quality of regulation, to achieve a just, authoritative, independent and efficient regulation. Further to regulate inspection market behavior effectively and to improve service levels. First, the article defines the core concepts, then expounded asymmetric information and regulatory capture theory. Second, combing the special background and regulatory development process, from the planned economy period and the transition period to elaborate regulatory change course and achievements. Third, identify the current practice of regulatory problems and reasons from regulatory relations, design aspects of the regulatory regime, regulation officers, and regulatory oversight accountability. Finally, according to injustice, lack of independence, inefficient and authority damages to put forward suggestions sound regulatory. The six areas are:rationalize the regulatory relationship, set system reasonable, strengthen staff, establish the industry self-regulation mechanism, improve oversight, sound supervising and accountability, legal protection.