Chaihushugansan Combined Baohewan Security And Treatment Of Functional Dyspepsia Postprandial Distress Syndrome (Middle-jiao Stasis Syndrome) Clinical Observation

Purpose:Observed in patients using theory to guide the transfer of dissipated Chaihushugansansan combined Baohewan security and treatment of functional dyspepsia postprandial distress syndrome(middle-jiao stasis Syndrome)for treatment and to evaluate its efficacy for the future clinical use of the drug in accordance with.Method:Patients diagnosed from Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital outpatient comply FD(PDS)of a total of 72,1:1 ratio were randomly divided into treatment and control groups.Treatment group:Chaihushugansansan combined Baohewan(Bupleurum,Cyperus,hawthorn,Citrus aurantium,Citrus,radish seed,root,white peony root,rhubarb,six Divine Comedy,ginger Pinellia,Poria,forsythia,licorice,etc.),4 weeks;the control group:domperidone,for 4 weeks.Result:(1)Two groups of patients before treatment average credit compared to the treatment group 27.81±1.12,control group was 28.33±1.17.T test,P>0.01.Comparison of age groups of patients,the treatment group was 37.00±1.043,control group was 38.42±0.983.T test,P>0.05.Comparison of two groups of gender,the treatment group 24 males and 12 females,the control group 25 males and 11 females,the X2 test,P>0.05.Therefore,before the two groups of patients in the points,age,gender aspects statistically insignificant difference.(2)compare the overall effect of the two groups were the main symptoms.Treatment of 36 cases,clinical cure,effective,progressive,were ineffective in 14 cases,0 cases,21 cases,1 case,the total effective rate was 97.2%;control group of 36 patients,the clinical cure,effective,progressive,were invalid 2 cases,0 cases,20 cases,14 cases,total effective rate was 61.1%.After inspection by the rank and concluded that the treatment group and the control group was statistically significant difference(P<0.01).The main symptoms described in terms of overall clinical efficacy of the treatment group than the control group.(3)groups SYMPTOMATIC overall effect comparison.Treatment of 36 cases,clinical cure,effective,effective,ineffective were 3 cases,23 cases,9 cases,1 case,the total effective rate was 97.2%;control group of 36 patients,the clinical cure,effective,effective,ineffective,respectively 1 case,3 cases,19 cases,13 cases,total effective rate was 63.8%.After inspection by the rank and concluded that the treatment group and the control group was statistically significant difference(P<0.01).Described in terms of the overall clinical syndrome treatment group than the control group.A comparison of symptom scores before and(4)two groups of patients.Postprandial discomfort symptom scores after treatment,the treatment group was 1.56±0.27;control group was 3.11± 0.23.Early satiety scores after treatment,symptoms,treatment group was 0.39±0.19,control group was 2.56±0.29.After the t-test concluded,it is integral statistically meaningful difference between the two groups after the treatment of patients(P<0.01).Description of the main symptoms of the clinical aspects of the overall treatment group than the control group.Compare total score of symptoms before and after(5)two groups of patients.Treatment of 36 cases,symptoms score before treatment was 27.81±1.12;control group of 36 patients in the symptom score of 28.33±1.17.After inspection by the rank and concluded that it is two groups of patients before treatment difference was statistically insignificant points(P>0.01).Treatment group of 36 patients,the symptom score after treatment was 7.03±0.68;control group of 30 patients after treating symptoms score of 18.19±1.33.After inspection by the rank and concluded that it is two groups of patients before treatment difference was statistically significant points(P>0.01).Described in terms of the overall syndrome improved clinical efficacy of the treatment group than the control group.Conclusion:From the above description of the use of data obtained Chaihushugansansan combined Baohewan therapy dyspepsia postprandial distress syndrome based Circulation negatively Theory of significant adverse reactions(middle-jiao stasis Syndrome)during all of the patients had no prove the clinical use of the present method can effectively improve or eliminate symptoms,improve the quality of life of patients and safe non-toxic side effects.Through clinical observation further proves the whole concept of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation advantages,to provide a more safe and effective treatment options FD(PDS)for the clinical treatment of patients.