Types Of Risk Tendency Of Maximizing And Satisfactory Decision-making Style And The Differences In Ambiguity Decision-making

In the life of different people facing the same event will have different choices,Schwartz et al.according to the theory of choice model and limited choice model theory,put forward the maximization and satisfaction of the two decision-making style theory,they believe that the maximum decision-making style Individual pursuit of event options and the results of the optimal,and satisfied with the decision-making style of the individual in the options and results only to meet their own standards.The individuals of the two decision-making styles show many differences in the decision-making.This difference is not only reflected in the options of the event,but also on the outcome of the event selection.In recent years,there has been an increasing interest in the decision-making of these two decision-making styles,especially in Ambiguity decision-making,because Ambiguity decision-making is a choice that is made under the ambiguity of decision-making rules.In our real daily life in the decisionmaking situation.Throughout the previous research results,mostly using literature review and measurement methods to be studied,and the use of behavioral experimental methods to study the performance of these two decision-making style is very few.In this study,we use the maximization scale,the risk-oriented BART task and the ambiguity decision-making IGT task paradigm to study the differences in the decision-making of these two decision-making individuals.Through the risk-based BART mission experiment,it is found that the amount of money obtained by the two types of decision-makers in the task and the average inflated number of the balloons are significant,indicating that the decision maker has the highest risk tendency in the decision-making satisfactory style of decision makers are less risky,And shows that the decision-making in the decision-making more risk-prone,satisfied with the style of decisionmakers in the decision-making more conservative.The IGT task experiment based on ambiguity decision-making shows that the amount of money obtained by the two types of decision-makers in the task is significant,and the number of money obtained by the decision-maker of the satisfaction style is larger than that of the decision maker in the IGT task,And the difference between the two styles of decision makers in the net score and the risk score is not significant.Analysis of the two types of subjects to complete the task of the net change process found that the maximum style of decision-makers in the task before the five groups of net performance ups and downs,after the five groups steadily increased;satisfactory style decision makers in the second group after net points have been steadily rising,indicating that maximizing the style of decision-makers in the options will continue to try,trying to find the best option,resulting in net fluctuations in the phenomenon.Satisfied style decision-makers in the options only need to meet their own internal standards,the options to find less,so the steady performance on the net score.Combined with the results of the BART experiment,the decision maker of the maximized style tends to be more risky in the decision-making process,and therefore more attempts to choose different options on the IGT task,while the decision-maker of the satisfaction style tends to be less risky Its performance on the IGT task is more stable,but with the maximization of the style of decision-makers gradually understand the experimental rules,the two decision-making subjects in the decision-making tasks on the performance will tend to be consistent.