Decoding Of Simulacra

Photography has been breaking through their own limitations,after each transformation are looking for greater changes.Whether from traditional chemical film to the present electronic imaging;or from the previous two-dimensional flat static images to today's 3D stereoscopic motion images.In addition,the innate virtual reality and the ability to imitate the truth of photography are always subject to all kinds of controversy,and these disputes from the beginning of the birth of photography until today has never corrupted,because it makes people easy to get the image At the same time let people on these complex images of the chaos decoding has become an insurmountable difficulties.The purpose of this article is to try to use the methods of semiotics,psychoanalysis,and media science to analyze the case of the female photographer of Vivian Mayr and to make people understand the image Diverse and complex dilemma.At the same time,the article will be on the "imitation of the" concept of a critical overview,as well as the identity of Vivian Mayr some sort out,and in the final discussion Vivian Mayr in a variety of context The changes that are presented.Because people from different social and cultural environment and political background led to the interpretation of the different images;Moreover,the interpretation of the image is not always and their original information and the same meaning.Here,in the article,Vivian Mayr as the producer of the image is how the code and the receiver of the image are how the decoding has been continued.Strictly speaking,the meaning of the image is likely to be constructed in this process only if the coders and decoders use the compatible symbols and symbolic systems together.In a sense,photographic photographs are virtually imitated in nature,and can be called "simulacra".First of all,as a picture of the object,the Italian symbolist Amber Echo's "image criticism" that although the image and the object of the existence of a similarity between the surface,but this symbol And other symbolic system,is "completely random,agreed into the vulgar,and no motivation at all." And the French cultural theorist Roland Barthes through the ontology to understand the nature of the photo "their own" and in semiotic terms,if the photo is involved in the matter,the photo itself is out of meaning.In this sense,the photo is an information without a symbol,because it is out of order,omnipresent and difficult to be classified.In this way,the photo to avoid our indicative significance.Second,as the object of viewing,people often refer to the theory of psychoanalysis in the photographic photographs of view that view is an ideological act,pointing out that people watch with a pirate and fetish Psychological affair,"voyeurism" and "fetish" are usually used for sexual images or pornographic images,and then that people view the way the photo is classified as the purpose of piracy and fetish.In addition,as the image of the media,the camera is an extension of the human eye,and the photo is an extension of human memory,the photo itself carries the information at the same time spread the information.It can be said that the image is both a medium of communication and a container of information,and it is not possible to separate it separately,but rather the two as a whole.