Font Size: a A A

The Empirical Study Of Synchronized Video Recording In The Process Of Interrogation

Posted on:2017-08-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z SuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2336330488451608Subject:Litigation
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The new criminal procedural law use the form of legislation to synchronize video recording in the process of interrogation in the first tie,then the interrogation synchronized video recording system has a new beginning.The supreme people's court,the supreme people's procuratorate,ministry of public security,state security,the justice department introduce about the specification of the synchronized video recording system repeatedly,the theoretical exploration of the system is flourishing.According to an empirical study,Interrogation of synchronized video recording running in practice has many realistic problems,such as the investigation organ with the file interrogation synchronized video recording transfer ratio is too low,in the trial interrogation synchronized video of cross-examination is insufficient,the defendant of have no right to copy interrogation of synchronized video recording,the police after the first Interrogation to record synchronized video recording,admissibility of confession record before court,the judge review synchronized video recording too formally.Interrogation of synchronized video recording,has four default function,in practice only prevent malicious confession and protect investigators from improper charges play well,restricting the interrogation process,the function of the oral confession have not been very good play.The reasons for this is that it is not clear to evidence of synchronized video recording,synchronized video recording is too lengthy,the consequences of violation of the synchronized video recording system not clear.We should from the following points to improve in the future,clearing synchronized video recording evidence status.increasing the transfer ratio.paying attention to protect defenders copy rights,clearing violation of interrogation consequences of synchronized video recording system,solving the problem of synchronous recording video content is not suitable for public,strengthening the judge's review,strengthening the interrogation synchronized video recording function of oral confession,making the synchronized video recording a better use of its functions of presupposition in practice.
Keywords/Search Tags:synchronized video recording, illegal interrogation, audio-visual material, Oral confession function
PDF Full Text Request
Related items