| The transformation of agricultural management pattern is a key way for the reform of agricultural modernization in China.This paper is based on the current situation of the reform of agricultural scale management in Songjiang District of Shanghai, trying to analyze the drawbacks of the reform of the government-led model. Through the research and analysis of this paper, on the one hand, from the centralized circulation of land to the initial formation of large-scale farming methods, to the specific mode of operation of the family farms later, the government through the rules, financial subsidies, supervision and management of several aspects of comprehensive To control the policy to promote the smooth, and create a Songjiang local characteristics of the family farm model. On the other hand, the government’s leading behavior has not brought theoretically benefit, but the farmers rely too much on government subsidies to maintain the benefits of large-scale operation. This depends on government supply of agricultural scale reform, in the long run there are many drawbacks.The reasonisthatour government under the guidance of Marxist classical theory is advocating large-scale operation, whichprovides for the possibility of policy-making. This worship of the scale theory, convinced that with the scientific understanding of the laws of nature will be able to design a rational social system. And in this process because of the special nature of our decision-making participation system, making the country’s strong leadership to achieve this desire to have the power to decide and action, which can ignore the experts and interest groups of information feedback. Coupled with the Government’s own goal is different from the development of market activities, the Government cannot count the cost of inputs to achieve policy objectives. Therefore, this government-led behavior reflects the high cost of investment and low efficiency of return, which eventually led to the original to improve the level of agricultural management policies become inefficient or negative effect.In the end prove there is ainevitable connection between government-leadingand policy failure.This is the defect of government instead of market to make decisions.That is the Government failure.To avoid this Government failure and better solve the present problems. The government should on the basis of the market demand to find its own accuratefunction orientation,and give full play to the autonomy of the people and the market. government-leading should only occur in the field of market failure. |