Research On The Registration System Of Administrative Litigation

With the formal implementation of the new administrative procedure law in May1,2015,the acceptance model of administrative litigation in China has entered a new stage.In recent years,with the rapid development of social life,the continuous improvement of people's life and the increasing awareness of the parties' right to sue,the perfection of the filing system of lawsuits is becoming more and more urgent.The new administrative procedural law at the legislative level made clear the changes in the mode of administrative proceedings,will be committed to ensuring that the parties actively and effectively exercise the right to appeal,while achieving the fairness and justice of the proceedings.The widespread promotion of the new law still has too many problems in real life practice.We have more news,through the network access to information is: administrative litigation cases have a "blowout" state,the administrative case closing rate is low,in line with the current situation,the state no longer presents an open attitude,how to manage and how to regulate the law,is the focus of this research.This paper is divided into three parts: firstly,China's administrative litigation registration system overview,by clarifying the basic concept of registration system,based on a certain understanding of the system background,a detailed description of the registration system of the legal status and the status quo,quantitative analysis of current administrative litigation environment.Secondly,the author analyzed the W in a court filing administrative litigation practice problems,from the types of cases,regional distribution,the parties constitute angle,quantitative analysis of specific problems in criminal practice related court in China.Finally,through the author's recommendations to effectively solve the above problems encountered in practice.First,starting from the legislation,clearly defined terms and improve the filing review standards;second,refine the case supervision system,effectively solve the difficult problem of the parties to appeal to prosecute complaints;third,actively expand theparties dispute resolution channels,providing a wide range of litigation,the judge to reduce litigation pressure,improve quality,clear fourth court proceedings;division of functions,the rational allocation of judicial resources,strengthen judicial efficiency,establish the credibility of justice.