Hong Xiuquan,Kang Youwei And Sun Yat-Sen's Research On Social Equality

Hong Xiuquan,Kang Youwei and Sun Yat-sen are all faced with the dilemma of the impact of western culture on Chinese tradition and where the Chinese tradition should go,so their social equality thoughts have the same parts: the concern about economic equality “reflects the reality trend of China's social economic development”;with equality between men and women is the disintegration of family.But the three absorbed different Chinese and Western equality thinkings,so the three social equality also have their own unique parts.In particular,Hong Xiuquan mainly absorbed the western Christian thought and the equal access to power thought.;while Kang Youwei accepted Utopian socialism,natural rights,Confucian virtuous equality;and Sun Yat-sen absorbed the thoughts of the natural human rights,separation of power and the equal access to power.The difference of the core values is the root cause of differences in social equality of the three people.The value,the concept and the system are a logical relationship from the inside to the outside.Hong Xiuquan's core value is poor,the three cardinal guides is the concept expression of the poor,and military officer responsibility system,holy depot system,and labor division system are the system expression of this concept.Kang Youwei's core value is equal,"everyone is independent,equality between men and women" is the concept expression of the equal,and “the family-border-breaking then build the government" is the system expression of this concept.Sun Yat-sen's core value is equal,national equality,political equality and economic equality are the concept expression of the equal,and the "Three People's Principles" is the system expression of this concept.Hong Xiuquan,Kang Youwei and Sun Yat-sen's thought of average wealth has the warning meaning on the narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor in contemporary China that the equality of results is not a continuation of egalitarianism,and cannot at the expense of efficiency,so we must take the fairness and efficiency into account.At the same time,it also provides important theoretical resources for the construction of pluralistic modernity.