Research On The Validity Of Art

The validity of art always forms an intertextual relationship with the art itself and its ideas,whether it is in the pre-modern period or modernism to postmodernism.Although art content is changing,but this relationship does not change ever.After an art explosion in the 1950s and 1970s,art has created an unprecedented scale in the world today,not just a simple quantitative change,but a way of thinking and an infinity extended.The expansion of this possibility undoubtedly opens up the scope of the expression of art,completes the art from the continuous exploration of the form to emphasize the concept of contemporary art changes.After the vigorous development in 50-70s,art was in a great development but the same time there are some problems too.Art was changing from whether it is good or bad to a real problem.First,the infinite use of artist’s creative material brings difficulties to the art appreciation.Secondly,due to the artist’s concept disjoint with the art works ’s way of seeing,leading to a large number of exhibitions preface language is obscure.Many artists’ work can not be established from the curator’s writing and the exhibition hall,and lose the possibility of interpretation.Through the thinking of these problems and the combing of the western art in the 1950s and 1970s,this paper discusses the dilemma of the increasing pattern of artistic grammar due to the infinite broadening of the art,and the increasingly mature art market under the background of western capital society.The preservation of contemporary art leads to"failure in the contemporary".At the same time,it retrospect the essential reason of the failure of art-the reproduction logic of western art and tries to reflect on it.