A Glimpse Of The "Xueheng School" Literary View And Cultural Thinking

At the end of the 19 th century and the beginning of the 20 th century,Chinese society coincided with the modern transformation period,the complex psychology of Chinese and Western culture and different positions,so that modern knowledge groups showed to maintain the traditional and against the traditional two mainstream ideological trends.And as a "cultural conservatism" on behalf of the stage on the stage of the "school of school",because of its "new cultural movement" reflection and criticism,in a very long period of time have been academic research of the cold.The rise of emancipating the minds of the 1980 s and the rise of "Guoxue hot" have led academics to re-examine the negative impact of the "New Culture Movement".As a reflection of the "new cultural movement" of the party,the "Xueheng School" gradually by the people concerned,fruitful results continue to emerge.The understanding of the role of "Xueheng School" in the "New Culture Movement" has also gradually turned to the existence of the checks and balances against the mainstream discourse in the context of the "New Culture Movement".The cultural innovation of "New Culture School" and "Xueheng School" advocates the positive coping with the challenges of modern Chinese intellectuals in modern times,and the divergence of ideas is a normal academic dispute."Xueheng School" as a "cultural conservatism" typical representative of the national tradition,on the national tradition,especially the Confucian culture has shown a strong sense of the standard.Its members are mostly new intellectuals who accept the duality of Chinese and Western cultures.Although there are specific differences in academic thought and so on,but adhere to the "cultural conservatism" of the reform path can be seen in the traditional main vein of the internal unity.In the modern era of China's double cultural crisis and the outbreak of the European war caused the "Oriental salvation theory" the rise of the era of the times,"Xueheng School" on the construction of social "modernity" path of the various kindsof sound thinking and practice,both for the time and later generations,no doubt have great reference and reference.This paper intends to "Xueheng School" selection and interpretation of "new humanism" as the breakthrough point,On the basis of investigating the relationship between "Xueheng School" and "New Culture Movement",it analyzes the literary ideas and cultural standpoints of "Xueheng School",Perhaps for the current Chinese society to solve the many modern problems,to provide some help and thinking.The first chapter is mainly from the "Xueheng School" problem consciousness and its reflection on the "New Culture Movement" as a breakthrough,On the basis of the simple analysis and analysis of the main members and types of "Xueheng" magazine,this paper investigates the interpretation of "Xueheng School" in the selection of modernity and the interpretation of national traditional culture in the "New Culture Movement" Of the steady thinking.The second chapter mainly focuses on the cultural vision of harmony between China and the West,which is advocated by "Xueheng School" at the beginning of the publication.Through the case study of the thought of "Xueheng" human and its national culture,as well as its members' study on the absorption and transformation of the "new humanism" Western learning resources in the dialogue,this chapter is aimed at investigating this academic group has a universal value in Chinese and Western culture and that on the concept of cultural innovation,through the selection of principles and the concept of control to reform the culture and shaping personality,in order to achieve the "strive for perfection" of the world.The third chapter is "Xueheng School" literature as the research object,discusses the view of classical literature history of "Xueheng School" and the traditional literature criticism with moral function as the core.The former puts forward the "imitation theory" of literary expression life,and made a severe attack on the "evolution theory" of the "New Culture School" and the popular romanticism and naturalist view of literature and art during the May Fourth Movement period.While the latter emphasizes the moral criticism of literature function,put forward the aesthetic standards of literary criticism and historical vision and the impartial attitude.In this paper,and the content of the fourth chapter,is rethinking the extension on the basis of the above discussion.Trying to use the whole group of modern intellectuals as the object of study,so that the intellectual group in a particular era under the background of the heterogeneity and homogeneity of the characteristics as a cut angle,to explore the position conflict and ideological debate between "Xueheng School" and "New Culture School".And from the controversy between classical Chinese and vernacular reflected the elite culture and popular culture against the tug of war,as well as the world culture gradually diversified dialogue trend,looking at the wave of globalization under the new world order concept of reasonable construction.The period of the May Fourth Movement was a critical period of the modern transformation of Chinese society.Among the cultural and academic groups emerging in the construction of the modern nation-state task,a multidimensional revolutionary enlightenment was launched to obtain the legitimate rights of Chinese culture."Xueheng School" and "New Culture School" as the "cultural conservatism" and "liberalism" two camp representatives,respectively,published "Chinese and Western reconciliation" and "overall Westernization" of cultural construction ideas.In the reconstruction of the legitimacy of modern knowledge to build a path at the same time,but also for the new cultural innovation movement to create a diverse and broad development environment.It can be said that the steady cultural thinking of the "flourishing quintessence,melting of new knowledge " made by the "Xueheng School" under the tide of the new culture has not only achieved a certain degree of balance and corrective action for the "new culture movement" which was the mainstream,but alsofor the late people in response to social transformation of the task of how to deal with and explain the traditional national culture,provides a useful resource and reference.