The Impact Of The Status Of The Rich And The Poor On Fairness And Its Source: The Regulatory Role Of The Social Entity's Sense Of Fairness

In social interaction,fairness is an eternal topic,a benchmarking and norm in dealing with all kinds of affairs.In ultimatum game,fair consideration is an important factor that affects people's decision results.We compare fairness between self interest and others' income.Fair attention is affected by many factors,one of which is our social identity with the other party.Society will affect our actions and decisions.In turn,our actions and decisions will strengthen our understanding and understanding of ourselves and the other 's identity.In social identity,the most notable is the identity of the rich and the poor.Therefore,the main purpose of this study is how the identity is affected by fair consideration,which may be regulated by what factors.In this study,three experiments were used to discuss the subject of the study: Experiment 1 is the influence of the identity of the rich and the poor on fairness consideration;Experiment 2 is to introduce the influence of the rich and poor status on fairness consideration after the introduction of favorable inequalities,which is made up of two small experiments.Experiment 2A: the introduction of favorable inequalities to explore the influence of the rich and poor status on the fairness consideration.Experimental 2B: favorable unfair transformation;Experiment 3 used to investigate the influence of possible sources of social entity justice,consists of four small experiments,pre Experiment 3: the cognition of social entity justice,Experimental 3A:social entity justice,Experiment 3B: reverse social entity justice;Experiment 3C: no social equity justice.Through Experiment 1,we have confirmed that the rich and poor identity of others can influence the decision making tendency of ultimatum game,the main manifestation is the higher acceptance rate for the unfair distribution of the poor,and through the analysis of the electrical components of the brain,it is found that the fair distribution of the rich is found to be closer to the expectations of the subjects than the moderate and unfair distribution after the expected violation of the expectations represented by the FRN,at the same time,the fair distribution of the poor is greater than that of the rich,that is,the expectations of the rich are close to the fair distribution,and the expectations of the poor may be far less than the fair distribution.In the Experimental 2A,we added a favorable unfair distribution scheme,and found that when the allocation is fair and fair distribution,the response to the allocation scheme made by the rich and poor identity is the same as the Experiment 1,but in the case of favorable injustice,the rate of rejection of the poor is higher than that of the rich,and the difference is significant.It is found in Experiment 2B that people prefer to make unfair transformation of the poor in order to maintain social fairness,this result further indicates that people's fair attention may be influenced by the social entity justice,and people will judge the amount distribution of the rich and poor identity owners from the point of view of maintaining the overall fairness of the society.Through pre Experiment 3,it is concluded that people do think that the poor and the rich are caused by social unfairness,and society is even more unfair to the poor.The behavioral results of Experimental 3A were very similar to the results of Experiment 1.It was suggested that the result of Experiment 1 was regulated and influenced by the social entity justice.In Experiment 3B,by manipulating reversely the sense of fairness in social entities,disappears the "generous" behavior of the extreme distribution of the poor,and is only more generous to the poor in the middle of the middle.In Experiment 3C,when we completely remove the impact of the sense of social equity,people's fair attention is only affected by the amount of money,which is no longer influenced by the identity of the rich and poor of the proposer,thus completely explaining that people's fair attention to the owners of different rich and poor identity is the influence by the social entity justice,which played an important role in people's decision-making activities.Through the whole study,we can draw a conclusion that the fairness of the other external events from the non current events,that is,the social entity justice,is far greater than the fair sense of unfair treatment in the current task,which is based on the identity and relevance of the opponent's proposer.And the result is a comprehensive consideration of social factors.