Font Size: a A A

Chongqing N District Procuratorate Applied The Investigation Report On The Criminal Case Speed Procedure

Posted on:2016-07-05Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X ChenFull Text:PDF
GTID:2356330482958156Subject:Criminal procedure law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
At present, along with the economic development, social structure adjustment, criminal cases increasing, criminal law amendment(eight),(nine) also added a lot of light counts, the judicial organs faces the conflict among more cases and less people. To solve this problem, June 27, 2014, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress authorized by the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate in parts of the country to carry out a pilot program in criminal cases quick judging, explore simplified sentences in proceedings of imprisonment in the simple cases. The pilot status of quick judging program has been widely concerned by the society. This article selects the people's Procuratorate of N District of Chongqing city as the object of investigation, and inspects the running status of the quick judging program in the basic level procuratorial organs.In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into four parts, a total of about twenty-two thousand words.The first part, the overview of the criminal cases quick judging program. First, the background of quick judging program. quick judging pilot is to implement the central judicial system reform requirements, solve the current conflict among rise in amount of criminal cases and the lack of judicial resourse. Second, the procuratorial organs quick judging procedures for the application of the standard basis.The four specification is based on the basic framework of the quick judging pilot, the pilot practice of guiding rapid decision. Third,The main characteristics of quick judging procedure, compared to the simple procedure, with the scope of the case more narrow, program can be simplified to a greater extent, pays more attention to the protection of defendant's lawsuit right, the relevant system design more flexible.The second part, the basic situation of the application of the quick judging program in the N District procuratorate. First,Quick judging procedures applicable to the case, including basic data of cutting speed cases, characteristic of the case: the crime single, non custodial coercive measures applicable rate, probation rate is higher, lawyers involved in the litigation rate low, two procuratorate and court cases cutting speed standard is unified, did not appear because the accused the objection of the facts and evidence to appeal the case. Second, the quick judging program in the starting and conversion of the procuratorate, the procuratorate throughthecaseofthethreediversiontoachievetheprogramtostart,conversion.third,theprosecutionofthecase,throughthereductionofthecaseofthetransfertime,relyingontheformationandmanagementofquickjudginggrouptoimprovetheefficiencyofhandlingcases,toensurethequalityofthecase.fourth,thespeedofthecaseofsentencingrecommendations,inordertoamplitudebasedsentencingrecommendations.fifth,theprotectionoftheprosecutioninright,procuratoratesecuritythroughthecreationofevidenceopeningsystemtorealise.sixth,thepublicprosecutorofthequickjudging,thesupervisionroleofthetrial.seventhm,theprotectionofprocuratorateinoption,throughthefullexplanation,pretrialdiscoveryofevidence,legalaiddutylawyersystemtoprotectthesuspect'srightofchoosingprocedure.eighth,theprocuratorateandthejudicialdepartmentsofcollaboration.themainmethodsis:thejointmeetingamongjudicialoffices,thesocialinvestigationarrangedtotheinvestigation,thejudicialbureauworkontheimplementationoflegalaidondutylawyer,thecasesrelativelytobeallocatedtothefixedjudges.thethirdpart,theproblemoftheapplicationofthequickjudgingprogram.first,theprovisionsofthepilotapproachisnotperfect,restrictthequickjudgingpilot.second,mostoftherightmainidlestartrightinthetravelingquickjudgingprocess,quickjudgingprocedureisstartedbytheprocuratorate.third,alargeamountthecasecausesprosecutionconflict.fourth,theactionofthesentencingsuggestionoftheprocuratorateisamereformality.fifth,theinternalfactorsrestrictingthequickjudgingpilot.sixth,socialinvestigationisnotideal,restrictingthecarryouttheproposaloftheprobation.seventh,becauseofcriminalsuspectsbasedontheconsiderationoftheplaceofimprisonment,theindividualdon'tlikequickjudgingprocedures.thefourthpart,theapplicationofquickjudgingproceduresbytheprocuratorialorgans.first,toimprovethelegalprovisionsofthequickjudgingprogram.second,toraiseawareness,playtheenthusiasmofthepublicsecurity,judicialdepartmentsinthepilot.third,tosimplifythedocument,improvemechanismtopromoteprocuratoratequickjudgingprogram.fourth,theperfectpathoftheprocuratoratesentencingrecommendation,byimprovingthepublicprosecutor'sunderstandingoftheimportanceofsentencingrecommendations,redefinethepositionoftheprocuratoratesentencingrecommendationsinthetrialtoimprovethesentencingrecommendation.
Keywords/Search Tags:Procuratorate
PDF Full Text Request
Related items