Research On The Choice Of Language And Language In Minority Litigation

In governing the country according to law,build socialism country under the rule of law,against the background of citizens,especially the minority citizens' consciousness of using the law to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests in the growing.But in the national autonomous regions and ethnic minority areas,ethnic minority citizens have the right to use their native language in the proceedings.The reality is that in the national autonomous regions,and proficient in the national minority community of the minority language and judges,prosecutors,investigators,absence of translators still exist;Even with proficient in minority investigators,absence of translators still exist;Even with proficient in minority language and judges,prosecutors and investigators,interpreters,but as a result of legislative protection,the program design,translation personnel qualifications,challenge system,in aspects of the implementation of the result in the litigation rights of the parties and other a series of procedural rights are not well protected,which caused dissatisfaction on the court,the parties dispute continuously,not achieve the expectant purpose.The authority of the court judgment also greatly affected.For bilingual education,ethnic minority language to protect domestic writings have many,but most will stay in the bilingual teaching mode of the field of study,the protection of national languae legislation,these are the provisions of the principle,be specifically used in the trial practice,in view of this minority language of litigation rights of the parties can only rely on rare judicial staff consciously practice.There is no mandatory binding,this leads to the judicial arbitrariness of staff.From the point of the research status of abroad,Canada's training bilingual(English and French),a judge for object is judge.The judge to master the bilingual to directly hear the statements of the parties,in the case of without using the translator can understand the parties in what to say.This is the embodiment of the principle of direct verbal trial.