| Properly handling with the relationship between government and the market is an important part to perfect the management system of real estate market in China.The blindness and lag of the market restrict the sustainable and healthy development of the real estate market.At present rapid development of real estate market,but there are some problems in the market that needs proper guidance and government intervention.With the differentiation of the real estate market,the government in the intervention of the real estate market need to use the thought of classification control.Differential selection and use of various types of policy tools should be used to reduce the risk of the real estate market and meet the housing needs of the community.It also can achieve the goal of stabling the house price and balancing the supply and demand of the real estate market.The object of this paper is the intervention mechanism of the real estate market and centers around the mode of action and the effect of the problem-oriented intervention mechanism on the real estate market.The first part introduces the research background,the basic concepts,theoretical basis,domestic and foreign research.The second part concerns the intervention mechanism of the problem-oriented real estate market,followed by dividing intervention tools into four categories of monetary,fiscal,land and administrative,researching the impact of tightening and relaxing the four policy instruments on the real estate market.The third part analyzes the operation status of the real estate market from 2013 to 2016,and then summarizes the main problems in the real estate market.The fourth part analyzes the classification regulation of the real estate market and evaluates itseffects,to begin with,analyzing the operational state of the real estate market from 2013 to2016 on the national level,and then summarizing the main issues of the real estate market on the basis of it.And again making classified discussion of the causes of outstanding problems,government intervention policy and the intervention effect of the real estate market in different cities by taking Shenzhen,Nanjing and Changzhou for examples.Finally,making quantitative analysis of the incidence of the inventoryof commercial residential buildings on sale which was supposed to be defused by different policy tools in short term by taking Changzhou for instance.The fifth part discusses the experiences of real estate market intervention in developed countries and regions,centering on the two sides of the curb of soaring housing price and balancing market supply and demand to research intervention policy and effect of different government and put forward the policy suggestions of China's real estate market intervention.The sixth part puts forward some suggestions on how to optimize the intervention of the real estate market in China,from the two perspectives of stabilizing the urban house prices and balancing the supply and demand of the third and fourth-tier cities,and hopes to establish the long-term mechanism of the healthy and steady development of the real estate market.The seventh chapter concludes the main conclusion and the existing problems of the thesis,and proposes the possible research fields and directions in the future.The conclusions of this paper are as follows: First the four types of policy tools play a different role on regulating the real estate market.Differentiated strategy are taked to adapt to the differentiation of the real estate market.Second the loose monetary environment,the average price of land and administrative intervention policy will affect the price of new commercial housing in Shenzhen.Third the average price of land,the administrative intervention policy and the average price of residential housing in the previous quarter will affect the average price of the real estate market in Nanjing.Fourth loose monetary policy and tight administrative policy are quite obvious when the government of Changzhou balanced the supply of demand of real estate market.Fifth learning from developed countries and regions,the stability of the housing prices of hot spots and balancing the supply and demand of the real estate market in three or four lines cities should be classified control,innovation policy tools.Hope that the long-term intervention mechanism for real estate gradually could be established. |
PDF Full Text Request