Research On Campus Plant Landscape Of Jiangxi University Of Finance And Economics

The study focused on the plant landscapes of the two campuses of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics’ s Jiaoqiao and Mailu.On the basis of fully retrieving and collecting a large amount of related literature and materials,on-site field investigations were conducted.From the perspective of ecology,The composition and characteristics of the campus flora and Community Characteristics.The AHP and SBE were used to evaluate the plant landscape.Based on the status quo,an optimization scheme was proposed.The main research content is:Identification of statistical plant species on the campus,statistical analysis of the vascular plants on the campus,family diversity,genera and seed plant families,genera distribution area types.The results showed that there were a total of 461 vascular plants in the two campuses,belonging to 326 genera and 117 families,of which 10 were ferns,10 genera and 11 species.There are 30 species of 17 genera in 7 families of gymnosperms and 422 species of 299 genera in 100 families of angiosperms.Campus plants are in composition of the family,the few-species family is the main body,and the dominant family is obvious.In the composition of the genus,the single-species genera is the main body,and the advantage genera are not obvious.There are many types of seed plants and the geographical composition is complex.The tropical component family constitutes the main body of the campus seed plant family.Among the species of the genus,the tropical component is the most important,and the temperate component has a slightly lower proportion,but the difference is not significant.Both occupy an important position.It has certain endemic components,2Chinese endemic families and 9 endemic genera.Typical sampling methods were adopted to divide the campus into functional areas based on the nature and function of the site.A total of 99 typical plant landscapes were collected at Jiaoqiao.A total of 90 typical plant landscapes were collected in the Mailu.The method of community ecology was used to analyze the landscape density,canopy density,quantitative characteristics,and species diversity of the sample plots.Using the AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process,it is composed of four aspects: visual quality,ecological quality,service quality,and cultural quality.A total of 8 quantitative indicators and 9 qualitative indicators were used to evaluate the landscape of 100 plots in two campuses.The scores of each evaluation index were analyzed and studied.The results showed that there were only 1 level I plant landscape,63 level IIplant landscapes,34 level III plant landscapes,and 2 level IV plant landscapes.The vast majority of plant landscapes were at level II and III levels.The SBE value was directly calculated by using the SBE beauty rating method on 100 plots of plant landscape photographs to obtain the landscape quality ranking of plot plants.The results showed that there were 59 positive SBE values and 41 negative SBE values for100 plant plots.The comparison of AHP and SBE evaluation results shows that the evaluation of campus plant landscape using AHP method and SBE method is less different and the assessment results are consistent,but the difference is inevitable.Both evaluation methods can reflect the quality of the plant landscape.The AHP method is more theoretical,scientific,and systematic,and can co-ordinate ecology,aesthetics,service,and culture.The SBE method focuses on visual effects.Based on the above investigation contents,Analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the current status of the campus plant landscape,and put forward five suggestions for the optimization of campus plant landscape of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics from the overall perspective,that is,the adjustment of plant canopy closure,the increase of ornamental grassland area,the increase of aquatic plants,and the improvement of campus plant landscape.The quality of service and the enhancement of the science education function of the campus plant landscape.Finally,choose the plant landscape with poor evaluation results for specific optimization.