Font Size: a A A

Mass Scaling Of Metabolic Rates Of Body And Organs In The Common Carp And The Triploid Carp

Posted on:2019-03-30Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:T DuanFull Text:PDF
GTID:2393330566480158Subject:Aquatic biology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In this study,the common carp?Cyprinus carpio?and the triploid carp?Cyprinus carpio Xiangyunnensis?was used to study the body mass?M?scaling of resting metabolic rate?RMR?,mass-specific oxygen consumption rate of organ(MS-MO2organ),organ mass(Morgan),and cell surface area of liver(SALC)and muscle(SAMC).The RMR,MS-MO2organ,SALC,and SAMC were compared between the common carp and the triploid carp.The results were as follows:1.RMR of the common carp and the triploid carp scaled with M by scaling exponents of0.717 and 0.748,respectively.There were no significant differences of both bRMR and RMR between species.2.MS-MO2 of liver,heart,and brain of the common carp was significantly higher,but MS-MO2 muscle of the common carp was lower than those of the triploid carp.MS-MO2 of liver,heart,and brain of both two species and MS-MO2 muscle of the common carp were negatively related to M,while MS-MO2 muscle2 muscle of the triploid carp was not related to M.The scaling exponent b values of MS-MO2 of liver,heart,and brain of the common carp were significantly lower than those of the triploid carp.MS-MO2 brain2 brain of the common carp was significantly higher than MS-MO2 liver2 liver and MS-MO2 muscle.MS-MO2 liver was higher than MS-MO2 heart and MS-MO2 muscle.MS-MO2 heart was higher than MS-MO2 muscle.There was no significant difference between MS-MO2 liver and MS-MO2 brain of the triploid carp.MS-MO2 liver and MS-MO2 brain of the triploid carp were higher than MS-MO2 heart.3.The SALC and SAMCC were not related to M of the common carp.The SALC of the triploid carp was negatively related to M by scaling exponent of-0.092,while the SAMC was positively related to M by scaling exponent of 0.196.The SALC and SAMCC of the triploid carp were larger than the common carp,but with no significant difference in scaling exponents.4.The Morgan of each species was positively related to M.The scaling exponents of Mliveriver were0.953 and 0.889,respectively.The scaling exponents of Mhearteart were 0.894 and 0.924.The scaling exponents of Mbrainrain were 0.473 and 0.523.The scaling exponents of Mmuscleuscle were 1.047and 1.046.There was no significant difference of b values among Morgan.The Mliver and Mmuscle of the common carp were significantly higher,but Mbrainrain significantly lower than that of the triploid carp.There was no significant difference of Mheart between speciesThe conclusions of this study were as follows:1.There was no significant difference between bRMR and RMR of two species,which supports MLB hypothesis.2.The scaling exponent b of MS-MO2 of each organ of the common carp was significantly lower than that triploid common carp,suggesting that MS-MO2 organ2 organ of the common carp fallen faster with M.There was no significant difference of bRMR and RMR between species,suggesting that the ontogenetic change of organ oxygen consumption rate was not the main mechanism affecting metabolic scaling.3.The SALC and SAMCC of the triploid carp were larger than those of the common carp,which supports the law that size of a triploid cell is greater than that of a diploid cell.4.The SALC and SAMC of the common carp did not change with M,while bRMR was less than1;on the other hand,the SALC decreased and SAMC increased with M of the triploid carp,which was not consistent with the predictions of the CM hypothesis.It suggests that in addition to the effect of cell size,the difference of bRMR may also be caused by the decrease in cellular metabolism.5.The ratio of the metabolically active organs,including liver,heart,and brain mass,to the body mass decreased with increasing M.On the contrary,the ratio of non-active muscles to the body mass increased with increasing M,but the degree of increase was too small to explain the scaling exponent of RMR.The results only partially support the organ size hypothesis.6.There was no significant difference in bRMR or RMR between two species,and the results were inconsistent with the prediction of the exchange area-metabolic demand constraints hypothesis.The metabolic levels of the active organs of the both species decreased with increasing M,but decreased significantly faster in the common carp and may have a negative effect on bRMR.Therefore,in addition to the limitations of exchange areas of cells,the effects of metabolic levels of cells on the scaling exponent should also be considered.
Keywords/Search Tags:Common carp, Triploid carp, Cell area, Oxygen consumption rate of organ
PDF Full Text Request
Related items