The Rethink Of Root-seeking Novel In New Period

This paper holds that there is a long-standing problem that the image,identity and location of the literary history are unclear.Therefore,the main task of this paper is to combine the macroscopic research angle of literary history with the microscopic method of rereading text,and try to endow it with a relative objective and definite identity position.The first part is preface.To comb the formation characteristics of the important literary schools in the contemporary literature history of China firstly;Secondly,it raises the question of identity ambiguity in the literature history of root-seeking novels,thirdly,according to the existing vague opinions on the identity of the root-seekingThe second part is to return to the historical scene of "public noise" when the root-seeking novel occurs,and to combine the theoretical articles of Hanshaogong,Zhengwanlong,Zheng Yi,A Cheng,Li Hangyu and so on,to review the debate about the three dimensions of root-seeking intension.The most intense debate focuses on whether the cultural stance of the root-seeking novel is a return to the tradition or a modern perspective.Among them,the latter view mainly from the partial root-seeking creation of Latin American Magic Realism literature to bear.In the contradictory debate between history and contemporary,criticizing the root-seeking novels alienated the modern construction of contemporary society and disputed the sound of its contemporary spirit coexist.The reason for this dimension of controversy lies in the mismatch between the views of the two factions on cultural concepts and literary practice.The historical debate about the root-seeking novel also arises from its different views on the traditional culture's identity psychology or critical attitude.Thus,some critics has deduced the and the dislocation between the theory and creation of root-seeking literature.The third part is used to analyse the motives of the chaotic identity of the literature history of root-seeking novels.The fundamental reason is that the 1980's medium-term historical context of the root-seeking novel is a special period of social and cultural transition in China,which is characterized by traditional/Western,cultural/political.Another important reason is the excessive emphasis on the broad concept of "culture" in the theory and creation of the root-seeking writers,which leads the interpreter to lose the broad error in defining the root of the novel.The final reason is the subjective misreading of the root-seeking attribution of the novel in the Fashion Criticism circle.Part four divides the root-seeking novels into the folk-land re-discovery,the three aesthetic dimensions,such as the educated youth discourse in the national spirit and the form exploration of the magical color,are used to interpret the root-seeking text,and try to give a relative objective and definite historical identity of the literature history.At the same time,it distinguishes the local,educated youth and pioneer novels,and clears out the novel texts which deviate from the core standard.The intersection of three dimensions,that is,to ideology and the retrial of national culture is the core identity point of the root-seeking novel.